• Home
  • Mattermost vs. Zulip

Mattermost vs Zulip comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mattermost Logo

Mattermost

327 views|187 comparisons
Zulip Logo

Zulip

158 views|130 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mattermost and Zulip based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
out of 38 in Enterprise Social Software
Views
327
Comparisons
187
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 38 in Enterprise Social Software
Views
158
Comparisons
130
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Mattermost
Zulip
Video Not Available
Overview

Mattermost’s mission is to make the world safer and more productive by developing and delivering secure, open source collaboration software that is trusted, flexible and offers fast time-to-value. Mattermost’s first product is a collaboration platform built to accelerate DevOps workflows in high-trust environments by offering secure messaging across web, desktop and native mobile devices.

Zulip is the only modern team chat app that is designed for both live and asynchronous conversations. Zulip topics create a separate space for each discussion, so different conversations will never get in each other's way. Teams of all sizes rely on Zulip - Fortune 500 companies, open-source projects, startups, and many others. Zulip is 100% open-source enterprise-grade software, self-hosted or in the cloud.

Zulip can transform how your organization communicates:

  • Leaders can prioritize their time and batch-reply to messages, and thus effectively participate in the chat community.
  • More discussions can be moved from meetings and email to chat.
  • Individual contributors can do focused work instead of paging through GIFs making sure they don’t miss anything important.
  • Remote workers can participate in an equal way to people present in person.
  • Employees don’t need to be glued to their keyboard or phone in order to avoid missing out on important conversations.
  • Everyone saves a huge amount of wasted time and attention.
Sample Customers
Broadridge, Galois, National University of Singapore, Rapitt, Center for Applied Internet Data Analysis, Funke Mediengruppe, Wargaming, Oetker Digital
iDrift AS, Technical University of Munich, University of California San Diego
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization63%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise67%
Large Enterprise28%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Mattermost is ranked 15th in Enterprise Social Software while Zulip is ranked 17th in Enterprise Social Software. Mattermost is rated 0.0, while Zulip is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Mattermost is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, whereas Zulip is most compared with Slack.

See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.