Maxta [EOL] vs Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Maxta Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
2,063 views|1,377 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Maxta [EOL] and Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The single-pane-of-glass VMware interface makes configuration and management easy so you do not need IT specialists."

More Maxta [EOL] Pros →

"The flash ability, in terms of tiering and caching, is amazing""The most valuable feature are the caching capabilities using the storage class memory.""The most valuable feature is that there is no single point of failure.""The performance, reliability, and affordability has been most valuable.""Its technical support is excellent.""It's mainly about the storage expansion, like in hyper-converged solutions."

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pros →

Cons
"A new company took over the product and now the support for Maxta has gone way downhill."

More Maxta [EOL] Cons →

"The management tool within this solution could be improved. We would also like to be able to access services like Azure when using this solution.""It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution.""I think the online documentation needs a lot of work and so do the sizing tools.""More optimization could be done in terms of mirroring.""It is scalable, but only beyond two nodes. If I go for two nodes it's not scalable. I need to build a complete cluster from the beginning if I'm going for two nodes.""Documentation management could be improved"

More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "With the data center licensing and everything that is connected to that, this solution is relatively costly."
  • "Cost-wise the product is one of the more affordable within the category of products."
  • More Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We found VMware’s vSAN was easy to set up, configure, and manage compared to other solutions we considered. It is best suited for small- to medium-sized organizations. It is easy to create load… more »
    Top Answer:It is difficult to get a hardware compatibility certification for the solution. In comparison, the process is easy for VMware and VSAN.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Views
    2,063
    Comparisons
    1,377
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    241
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Storage Spaces Direct
    Learn More
    Overview

    Maxta MxSP software-defined storage solutions provide organizations the choice to deploy hyper-convergence on any x86 server, using any hypervisor and any combination of storage devices. 

    Storage Spaces Direct uses industry-standard servers with local-attached drives to create highly available, highly scalable software-defined storage at a fraction of the cost of traditional SAN or NAS arrays. Its converged or hyper-converged architecture radically simplifies procurement and deployment, while features like caching, storage tiers, and erasure coding, together with the latest hardware innovation like RDMA networking and NVMe drives, deliver unrivaled efficiency and performance.

    Sample Customers
    VSS Monitoring, Vedams, ESG, City Government of Venray, Intel, Driscoll's
    Acuutech, Quest Technology Management, Bradley, Mead & Hunt
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Maxta [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is ranked 9th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 7 reviews. Maxta [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Maxta [EOL] writes "Has the ability to have a single-pane-of-glass using the VMware interface but it needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct writes "Stable solution with an easy initial setup process". Maxta [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct is most compared with VMware vSAN, StarWind Virtual SAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and DataCore SANsymphony.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.