Compare McAfee Web Protection vs. Webroot DNS Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Webroot DNS Protection? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Internet Security. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's very stable, reliable and does its job.The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great.It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy.The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.The most valuable feature is that it secures our network against blacklisted or malicious websites.Using this solution has meant that we've needed to make fewer firewall changes.

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

The solution does what it's meant to do.It has dependable anti-malware and intrusion prevention features all-in-one package.The most valuable is the blocking of blacklisted sites, a URL that is, either by intelligence or by McAfee, detected as a malicious site.It's a solution that permits making a granular configuration and it is easier to deploy the same configuration on a lot of devices using the central console. It is the master of the product.The most valuable feature of this solution is that it protects against threats that are coming from the web.The most valuable feature is the ease in the configuration for security roles.

More McAfee Web Protection Pros »

The installation is easy and doesn't take long. The program speedy and doesn't crash. It doesn't consume computer hardware or software.

More Webroot DNS Protection Pros »

Cons
It has happened in the past that Cisco Umbrella has denied us access to secure websites.The reporting could be improved by way of the information that's displayed. For example, when you pull a report, it shows an internal employee going to many websites, but you can spin that right down by saying a lot of it is being cached.I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.Support for multiple domains is important to us.I would like to see DLP integration in the next release of this solution.

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

Lacking filter for spam.The manufacturerers should have more transparancy about exactly what is getting filtered when you use the product and why.We used a consultant to help us set it up. Unfortunately, he was not that good. They were out of McAfee people. He was a consultant and knew the product, but he was not a McAfee person. How they managed it and how they worked was not straightforward.The configuration could be simplified because it is more complex to make the configuration on McAfee. What can be improved is the support of the agent on smartphones, IOS or Android. That still now is not available yet.The solution should be more proactive in regards to sending you updates.We need a better customer experience and more flexibility in the product.

More McAfee Web Protection Cons »

The reporting system needs improvement. They should make is that we can customize it so we can add, remove or change its interface but they use a template. The reports cannot be changed.

More Webroot DNS Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.The price could be lower.The product is pricey compared to Cisco Firepower.

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

$150 Canadian per year.

More McAfee Web Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenDNSMcAfee Web Gateway, McAfee SaaS Web ProtectionSecureAnywhere DNS Protection
Learn
Cisco
McAfee
Webroot
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

McAfee is one of the world’s leading independent cybersecurity companies. Inspired by the power of working together, McAfee creates business and consumer solutions that make the world a safer place. By building solutions that work with other companies' products, McAfee helps businesses orchestrate cyber environments that are truly integrated, where protection, detection, and correction of threats happen simultaneously and collaboratively. By protecting consumers across all their devices, McAfee secures their digital lifestyle at home and away. By working with other security players, McAfee is leading the effort to unite against cybercriminals for the benefit of all.

Webroot SecureAnywhere DNS Protection offers a quick, straightforward, and highly effective way to secure the DNS protocol connection against cyberattacks. With advanced reporting on more than 80 URL categories, admins gain greater visibility than ever, reduce risk, and can tailor usage policies to their organization's unique needs.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about McAfee Web Protection
Learn more about Webroot DNS Protection
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaimSicredi
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Consumer Goods Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
K 12 Educational Company Or School11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company28%
Government5%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider24%
Insurance Company6%
Government5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Internet Security. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
McAfee Web Protection is ranked 4th in Internet Security with 6 reviews while Webroot DNS Protection is ranked 5th in DNS Security with 1 review. McAfee Web Protection is rated 8.2, while Webroot DNS Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Web Protection writes "Easily blacklist malicious sites both on premise and on the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot DNS Protection writes "Speedy, finds a lot of infections, and protects your computer". McAfee Web Protection is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Forcepoint Web Security, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection , Barracuda Web Security Gateway and Cisco Email Security, whereas Webroot DNS Protection is most compared with Forcepoint Web Security and Zscaler Internet Access.

See our list of .

We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.