We performed a comparison between MetaDefender and Symantec Content Analysis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools."I like the simplicity, the way it works out of the box. It's pretty easy to run and configure. The integration of the network devices with the ICAP server was easily done."
"We use Symantec Content Analysis for malware scanning."
"The documentation is not well written, and I often need to talk with support."
"The solution's alerting and reporting are basic and could use some improvement."
MetaDefender is ranked 17th in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review while Symantec Content Analysis is ranked 31st in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review. MetaDefender is rated 9.0, while Symantec Content Analysis is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of MetaDefender writes "Blocks malicious files , has a low false-positive rate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Content Analysis writes "The solution can be used for malware scanning, but its alerting and reporting could be improved". MetaDefender is most compared with VirusTotal, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Forcepoint ZT CDR (Zero Trust Content Disarm & Reconstruction), whereas Symantec Content Analysis is most compared with Forcepoint ZT CDR (Zero Trust Content Disarm & Reconstruction).
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
