We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"It is stable and scalable."
"We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"Provides great functionality."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"It is a stable solution."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
"Improve the API speed."
"There needs to be better documentation."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"Qualys VM's machine learning and artificial intelligence features could be improved."
"Qualys currently does not have any features for scanning SCADA, IoT, and Industrial Control Systems."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while Qualys VMDR is ranked 4th in IT Asset Management with 77 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
