Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] vs Snow License Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and Snow License Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management.
To learn more, read our detailed License Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Søren Tøpholm
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is stable and scalable.""We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that.""This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."

More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pros →

"The discovery is excellent. It is agent-based, and it can also operate without one as long as there is an inventory source, such as SCCM. It may take data from the SCCM and normalize it to provide a very clear idea of what the hardware is, what software is running on it, what versions of that software are available, when is the end-of-life, and when they are no longer supported. All of that information is available.""The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

More Snow License Manager Pros →

Cons
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated.""There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas.""The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."

More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Cons →

"The dashboards provided by the solution have certain shortcomings, making it in areas where improvements are required.""The support is an area that can be improved. As resellers, we are doing the first-level support because we have trained certified engineers, and we provide support. Because we are in India and they do not have a support center in India, the turnaround time for tickets could be improved. We have to rely on Australia for support."

More Snow License Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From my experience, Asset Manager is expensive."
  • More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would rate the pricing a seven or eight out of ten. It is not a cheap solution, but it provides good value for money."
  • "I rate the product price as a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."
  • More Snow License Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which License Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is very easy.
    Top Answer:The product's price is neither too high nor too low, meaning it falls under the middle range. I rate the product price as a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. There is a… more »
    Top Answer:The dashboards provided by the solution have certain shortcomings, making it in areas where improvements are required. The dashboards are not very configurable, and there are not many options… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In License Management
    3rd
    out of 24 in License Management
    Views
    581
    Comparisons
    254
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    540
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Asset Manager, HPE Asset Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    HPE Asset Manager automates best practices across the asset management lifecycle and integrates processes into IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) service support workflows including incident, problem, and change management to improve service quality and business outcomes.

    Snow License Manager is the central information hub of Snow's advanced Software Asset Management (SAM) platform – providing a unified view of all cloud resources, software and hardware assets, license entitlements and application usage metrics.

    Sample Customers
    Finansbank, MTS India, Sprint
    Imperial Brands, TVO, informa, Bridgestone, UK Food Retailer, Velux, LSE, TalkTalk, Insta, Swedbank
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Buyer's Guide
    License Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in License Management while Snow License Manager is ranked 3rd in License Management with 2 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while Snow License Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snow License Manager writes "It is very easy to use, maintain and deploy". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Snow License Manager is most compared with BMC Remedy and AWS License Manager.

    See our list of best License Management vendors.

    We monitor all License Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.