• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Srprogmagr567
Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
37th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
OpenText
OpenText
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Migros Bank AG
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.