• Home
  • OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. ZAPTEST

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs ZAPTEST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

OpenText Business Processing Testing

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews
185 views|113 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST Logo

ZAPTEST

Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
526 views|274 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Business Processing Testing and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Srprogmagr567
Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool
Anonymous User
The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation.
I was able to automate an application, where object identifications have impeded any progress in automating the regression bed. With ZAPTEST, we... Read more →
Ranking
37th
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
185
Comparisons
113
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
31st
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
526
Comparisons
274
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
Learn More
OpenText
ZAPTEST
Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
Sample Customers
Migros Bank AG
AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm16%
Computer Software Company13%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while ZAPTEST is ranked 31st in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with , whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Automation Anywhere (AA) and ReadyAPI.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.