• Home
  • OpenText Content Manager vs. OpenText File System Archiving [EOL]

OpenText Content Manager vs OpenText File System Archiving [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
File Archiving
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Content Manager and OpenText File System Archiving [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Giovanny-Buitrago
A solution for managing content with low maintenance
The first advantage is integration with your IP directory. You can customize any metadata and centralize all content, making it accessible to... Read more →
Use OpenText File System Archiving [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
  • "The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
  • "I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

    • More OpenText Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:An advantage is integration with your IP directory.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Conte...
    Top Answer:The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs. You will have to pay more… more »
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?
    Top Answer:Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 23 in File Archiving
    Views
    197
    Comparisons
    94
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    410
    Rating
    8.3
    Unranked
    In File Archiving
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
    Livelink ECM File System Archiving, Livelink ECM
    Learn More
    OpenText
    OpenText
    Overview

    OpenText Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

    OpenText File System Archiving (formerly Livelink ECM - File System Archiving) enables you to conserve space on your file server and store content indefinitely and securely, using the proven strength of OpenText archiving technologies. Automate the capture of shared file systems into a single repository, and leverage powerful records management controls to comply with policies and simplify the disposal of documents. File System Archiving provides a reliable foundation for your evolving file storage requirements, reducing future integration costs and protecting your investment in existing technology.

    File System Archiving is secure and reliable. Based on proven OpenText solutions, you can be confident that an investment in File System Archiving is an investment in long-term storage and archiving capabilities. Physical files are managed by a secure document archive. All contextual metadata information, including auditing, version control, security permissions, and more, is handled by a dedicated metadata management layer.

    Sample Customers
    Missouri State Courts
    Linde Schweisstechnik GmbH, BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health, Anglian Water,
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government58%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    Non Tech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise54%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    File Archiving
    May 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving. Updated: May 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 21 reviews while OpenText File System Archiving [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in File Archiving. OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6, while OpenText File System Archiving [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". On the other hand, OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Microsoft Purview Records Management, whereas OpenText File System Archiving [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.