Compare Micro Focus Content Manager vs. OpenText File System Archiving

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Content Manager vs. OpenText File System Archiving and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price could perhaps be lower as well.""Our cost is around $20,000 per month. The previous year, it was around $30,000 per month. It now costs less because Commvault changed the licensing type for providers.""Our yearly cost is around €20,000... The cost is based on the number of users and the amount of data. They sell it per terabyte.""There is a bit of cost involved with signing up the entire solution. It's not a cheap solution.""Commvault licensing is a perpetual license so only the support is being renewed yearly.""The complete license gives us options for all the features. Commvault does not license based on storage or the management components. It can integrate with any storage vendor. That means that when we are out of storage and need more, we can integrate without additional licensing. In my opinion, Commvault needs to reduce the licensing cost by 20 to 40 percent to make it cost-efficient.""We went from Veritas NetBackup to Commvault. We switched due to upfront licensing and costs. We have more visibility into what we're actually purchasing. It seemed like, overall, the cost of Commvault was cheaper.""It is cheaper than Veeam."

More Commvault Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."

More Micro Focus Content Manager Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I have never used Commvault before but I have been using Veritas NetBackup for many years and I am very satisfied with… more »
Top Answer: Veritas Netbackup is more logical and it's easy to understand the technicality behind the product. It has its own logs… more »
Top Answer: The backup and restore capabilities are key. The most useful things to us about Commvault, in general, is the breadth of… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
Livelink ECM File System Archiving, Livelink ECM
Learn More
Overview

Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime.

Micro Focus Content Manager, formerly Records Manager, is a governance-based enterprise content management system designed to help government agencies, regulated industries and global organizations manage their business content from creation to disposal. Regardless of how you create and collaborate on your content, Content Manager gives you the ability to leverage accurate, contextual, and complete information throughout its lifecycle. Managing your content in this way helps you significantly improve services to your customers, business decisions and insight for future strategy.

OpenText File System Archiving (formerly Livelink ECM - File System Archiving) enables you to conserve space on your file server and store content indefinitely and securely, using the proven strength of OpenText archiving technologies. Automate the capture of shared file systems into a single repository, and leverage powerful records management controls to comply with policies and simplify the disposal of documents. File System Archiving provides a reliable foundation for your evolving file storage requirements, reducing future integration costs and protecting your investment in existing technology.

File System Archiving is secure and reliable. Based on proven OpenText solutions, you can be confident that an investment in File System Archiving is an investment in long-term storage and archiving capabilities. Physical files are managed by a secure document archive. All contextual metadata information, including auditing, version control, security permissions, and more, is handled by a dedicated metadata management layer.

Offer
Learn more about Commvault
Learn more about Micro Focus Content Manager
Learn more about OpenText File System Archiving
Sample Customers
Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, Alliant Credit Union, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz Company
Missouri State Courts
Linde Schweisstechnik GmbH, BMO Harris Bank, Pacific Life Insurance Company, China CITIC Bank International Limited, Techint Group, Agility, Lahey Health, Anglian Water,
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Retailer8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Government58%
Healthcare Company8%
Non Profit8%
Non Tech Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Government21%
Comms Service Provider14%
Pharma/Biotech Company3%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise79%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise36%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available

Micro Focus Content Manager is ranked 5th in File Archiving with 1 review while OpenText File System Archiving is ranked 15th in File Archiving. Micro Focus Content Manager is rated 3.0, while OpenText File System Archiving is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Content Manager writes "Difficult to learn, poor technical support, and needs better integration with SharePoint". On the other hand, Micro Focus Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Suite Platform, Alfresco and Objective ECM, whereas OpenText File System Archiving is most compared with .

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.