Compare Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. WebInspect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,050 views|36,935 comparisons
WebInspect Logo
7,318 views|5,102 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. WebInspect and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important.""It has an easy-to-use interface.""We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence."

More Veracode Pros »

"I do not remember any issues with stability.""The licensing was good.""The installation was easy.""The solution scans our code and provides us with a dashboard of all the vulnerabilities and the criticality of the vulnerabilities. It is very useful that they provide right then and there all the information about the vulnerability, including possible fixes, as well as some additional documentation and links to the authoritative sources of why this is an issue and what's the correct way to deal with it.""The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution.""t's a cloud-based solution, so there was no installation involved.""This product is top-notch solution and the technology is the best on the market.""The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and Jira."

More Micro Focus Fortify on Demand Pros »

"Technical support has been good.""I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level.""It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning.""It is scalable and very easy to use.""The most valuable feature is the static analysis.""The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use.""The accuracy of its scans is great.""The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

More WebInspect Pros »

Cons
"We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time.""Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan."

More Veracode Cons »

"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there.""Primarily for a complex, advanced website, they don't really understand some of the functionalities. So for instance, they could tell us that there is a vulnerability because somebody could possibly do something, but they don't really understand the code to realize that we actually negate that vulnerability through some other mechanism in the program. In addition, the technical support is just not there. We have open tickets. They don't respond. Even if they respond, we're not seeing eye to eye. As the company got sold and bought, the support got worse.""The reporting capabilities need improvement, as there are some features that we would like to have but are not available at the moment.""The solution has some issues with latency. Sometimes it takes a while to respond. This issue should be addressed.""The technical support is actually a problem that needs to be addressed. Since the acquisition and merger with Hewlett Packard, it has been really hard to know who the technical or salesperson to talk to.""This solution would be improved if the code-quality perspective were added to it, on top of the security aspect.""The vulnerability analysis does not always provide guidelines for what the developer should do in order to correct the problem, which means that the code has to be manually inspected and understood.""The thing that could be improved is reducing the cost of usage and including some of the most pricey features, such as dynamic analysis and that sort of functionality, which makes the difference between different types of tools."

More Micro Focus Fortify on Demand Cons »

"The initial setup was complex.""I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities.""The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective.""The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex.""Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved.""It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved.""Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us.""Lately, we've seen more false negatives."

More WebInspect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server.""It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount.""The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition.""It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."

More Micro Focus Fortify on Demand Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand.""Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

More WebInspect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: JaeLee, check out our comparison page here of Veracode vs Checkmarx… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Veracode. Our uses cases included removing vulnerable code from our Product and ensuring the product… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: FOD per APP (1 round) like $1000.00 Cost for a partner.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and… more »
Top Answer: This solution would be improved if the code-quality perspective were added to it, on top of the security aspect. It… more »
Top Answer: The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand.
Top Answer: There were times when we had to run the login sequence several times in order to capture it properly. It took us between… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
Fortify on DemandMicro Focus WebInspect, Fortify WebInspect
Learn
Veracode
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand’s application security-as-a-service is the easy and flexible way to identify vulnerabilities in your applications without additional investment in software or personnel. Allow our global team to work for you, providing support and technical expertise 24/7.

Most enterprises rely heavily on the Web to conduct their normal operations, whether providing services, a mechanism for retail sales, or a host of other functions. Yet, most still struggle with efficiently managing their application security risks. For one thing, they need solutions of scale that can be used to manage thousands of active sites and assessments while also tracking discovered vulnerabilities, retesting procedures, and more. They need to perform repeated security tests to address compliance with regulations, legislation, and internal security policies and also see how their risk posture has changed over time. The enterprises have to protect their data, brand, and bottom line from the harsh impacts of what successful vulnerability exploitation could bring. Micro Focus WebInspect Enterprise enables organizations to solve these security problems quickly, efficiently, and intelligently.
Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
Learn more about WebInspect
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerSAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more. Aaron's
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer6%
Pharma/Biotech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm38%
Computer Software Company15%
Retailer15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government11%
Insurance Company3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise65%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. WebInspect and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is ranked 4th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews while WebInspect is ranked 11th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 8 reviews. Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is rated 7.2, while WebInspect is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand writes "Detects vulnerabilities and provides useful suggestions, but doesn't understand complex websites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebInspect writes "Great centralized dashboard but is a bit overpriced". Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Coverity, HCL AppScan and OWASP Zap, whereas WebInspect is most compared with OWASP Zap, PortSwigger Burp, HCL AppScan, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner and Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner. See our Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. WebInspect report.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.