We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."
"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."
"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."
"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."
Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is rated 10.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) writes "Provides a good balance of flexibility and functionality; very powerful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "Integrates well with SAP models, but doesn't integrate with performance trackers like Jira". Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is most compared with Broadcom Clarity PPM, Jira, JIRA Portfolio, ITM Platform and Microsoft Project Server, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with Jira, Planview Enterprise One, Microsoft Project Server, Artemis Enterprise and Planisware.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.