• Home
  • OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Ruxit [EOL]

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Ruxit [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 8 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews
707 views|526 comparisons
55% willing to recommend
Dynatrace Logo

Ruxit [EOL]

Read 4 Ruxit [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Real User Monitoring and Ruxit [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Yasir Amin
The reports and metrics we collect help us to improve our services
Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
Mark Kaplan
Best overall monitoring system out there
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
  • "If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
  • "Not expensive."

    • More OpenText Real User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:Real User Monitor has improved our productivity.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
    Top Answer:We use Real User Monitor to monitor services and capture problems from a user perspective, such as availability issues. The reports and metrics we collect from Real User Monitor help us to improve our… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. ...
    Top Answer:Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with… more »
    Read all 72 answers   →
    Ranking
    45th
    out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Views
    707
    Comparisons
    526
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM, MF RUM
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Dynatrace
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

    ruxit provides all-in-one monitoring and operations management for DevOps teams working in startups, mid-sized companies, and large organizations. Using proprietary artificial intelligence technology, ruxit enables companies to manage thousands of servers using a simple interface.

    ruxit includes monitoring features that cover your entire application stack:
    • Real user monitoring (browser-based performance monitoring)
    • Application performance monitoring for Java, Node.js, and .NET (PHP and Ruby coming soon)
    • Server and process monitoring for Windows and Linux
    • Network monitoring
    • EC2 virtual infrastructure monitoring

    Sample Customers
    Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
    Sofico, lemniscus.de, CHIP Digital, BARBRI INC, Bluesoft, uninett.no, Usersnap
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government9%
    Computer Software Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText Real User Monitoring is ranked 45th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 8 reviews while Ruxit [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. OpenText Real User Monitoring is rated 6.2, while Ruxit [EOL] is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Real User Monitoring writes "The reports and metrics we collect help us to improve our services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruxit [EOL] writes "Best overall monitoring system out there". OpenText Real User Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Honeycomb.io and VMware Aria Operations for Applications, whereas Ruxit [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.