• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. Qualibrate

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs Qualibrate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL]

Read 6 Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Qualibrate Logo

Qualibrate

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews
314 views|121 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and Qualibrate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Reviewer148493
Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently
Before Qualibrate, we did a release in about three months, and the regression testing would take us about three weeks with 15 people. Now, we do it... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."
  • "Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."
  • "We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."
  • "We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."
  • "I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

    • More Qualibrate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Functional Testing Tools
    35th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    314
    Comparisons
    121
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Service Test, HPE Service Test
    Learn More
    OpenText
    Qualibrate
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

    Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

    Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

    All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.
    Sample Customers
    John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
    AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while Qualibrate is ranked 35th in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Qualibrate is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualibrate writes "Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently". Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Qualibrate is most compared with Tricentis Tosca.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.