Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Silk Test

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 35th in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test which is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0, while Silk Test is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), whereas Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus Service Test Logo
Micro Focus Service Test
760 views|146 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
Silk Test
Read 3 Silk Test reviews.
10,020 views|3,576 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Malli Bharathi M
An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities. This was the major reason for going with Silk Test. The people... Read more »
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
Download now
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
35th
out of 48 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
760
Comparisons
146
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
14th
out of 48 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
10,020
Comparisons
3,576
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
747
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
UFT (QTP) vs. Micro Focus Service Test
Compared 100% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
UFT (QTP) vs. Silk Test
Compared 21% of the time.
LoadRunner vs. Silk Test
Compared 20% of the time.
Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test
Compared 16% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service TestSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn More
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn More
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Worksoft and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2019.
Download now
360,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also Micro Focus Service Test Reviews, Silk Test Reviews, and our list of Best Functional Testing Tools Companies.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
Sign Up with Email
  • Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
  • Your own page to promote your professional skills
  • Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
As seen in:

By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
  • Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
  • Your own page to promote your professional skills
  • Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
As seen in