Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Silk Test

Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 38th in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 17th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0, while Silk Test is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Micro Focus Service Test Logo
Micro Focus Service Test
174 views|137 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
Silk Test
Read 3 Silk Test reviews.
5,217 views|3,668 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
Malli Bharathi M
An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities. This was the major reason for going with Silk Test. The people... Read more »
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Tricentis, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
Download now
382,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.

Read more »

report
See Which Vendors Are Best For You
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See Recommendations
382,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
38th
out of 52 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
174
Comparisons
137
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
17th
out of 52 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
5,217
Comparisons
3,668
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
626
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
+ Add more products to compare
UFT (QTP) vs. Silk Test
Compared 22% of the time.
LoadRunner vs. Silk Test
Compared 19% of the time.
Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test
Compared 16% of the time.
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service TestSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn More
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn More
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bankKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Insurance Company12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Retailer5%
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Tricentis, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
Download now
382,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See also Micro Focus Service Test Reviews, Silk Test Reviews, and our list of Best Functional Testing Tools Companies.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
Sign Up with Email
  • Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
  • Your own page to promote your professional skills
  • Join a community of experts to call upon for support
As seen in:

By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
  • Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
  • Your own page to promote your professional skills
  • Join a community of experts to call upon for support
As seen in