Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Silk Test
Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 37th in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020. 431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs. 431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 125 Comparisons 90 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 5,455 Comparisons 3,688 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 625 Avg. Rating 7.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 21% of the time. Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Service Test, HPE Service Test | Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test |
Learn | |
| Micro Focus | Micro Focus |
Overview | |
Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services. | SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test | Learn more about Silk Test |
Sample Customers | |
| John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank | Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Computer Software Company50% Comms Service Provider12% Insurance Company6% Retailer4% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.