Compare Micro Focus Service Test vs. Silk Test
Sponsored
 | Judy Zeman QA Manager at Carrier Global Corp. |
Use Micro Focus Service Test? Share your opinion.
 | Malli Bharathi M IT Service Delivery Manager Testing and RPA at a transportation company |
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done."
"The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP."
"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."
"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts.
Top Answer: Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase… more »
Top Answer: We would like this to be able to be used outside of SAP applications, as it would be good for other types of products.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot… more »
Top Answer: We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee.
Top Answer: We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party… more »
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about Micro Focus Service Test
Learn more about Silk Test
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies
Manufacturing Company28%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Consumer Goods Company13%
Logistics Company8%
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company5%
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise85%
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2021.
479,323 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Micro Focus Service Test is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Silk Test is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Micro Focus Service Test is rated 0.0, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". Micro Focus Service Test is most compared with , whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Selenium HQ, Apache JMeter and Tricentis Tosca.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.