• Home
  • Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs. SmarteSoft Testing Suite

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night.
Use SmarteSoft Testing Suite?
Ranking
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
42nd
out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
Views
103
Comparisons
84
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
OpenText
SmarteSoft
Video Not Available
Overview

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
Sample Customers
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is ranked 42nd in Functional Testing Tools. Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6, while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". On the other hand, Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SmarteSoft Testing Suite is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.