Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs OneTrust DataGovernance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Information Protection and OneTrust DataGovernance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. OneTrust DataGovernance Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Incorporating data loss prevention capabilities built into the Microsoft platform to endpoints, such as Windows 10 and Windows 11 computers, can also help prevent data loss and is highly advantageous.""Before using it, we had a lot of unlabeled data, and the tool helped us quickly and accurately label a large number of documents.""It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.""The UI is user-friendly, and I have observed that it improves further each year.""We can restrict access or specify who can see sensitivity labels, which can be based on the classification level. We can encrypt restricted content and limit who can see that from an internal view, too, so Purview is a powerful tool."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Pros →

"One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly.""This product makes it easy to manage personal data.""The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident."

More OneTrust DataGovernance Pros →

Cons
"There is potential for more integration in the use of AI.""Our primary concern is third-party application visibility. Many people choose other DLP tools, as they can search the Office 365 suite and detect sensitive information across thousands of other apps. The product is weak compared to the competitors on the DLP front, but the classification is good; the tool needs a bit more maturation.""Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time.""There is room for improvement with the policy tips feature.""Microsoft can improve the affordability of Purview Information Protection by offering it at a lower cost."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Cons →

"Deployment is a big issue.""The integration with third-party products could be better.""The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there. My team reached out to the support team, and their experience was not satisfactory."

More OneTrust DataGovernance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."
  • "The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."
  • More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a licensing fee that we pay regularly."
  • "The product is worth every penny."
  • "The solution is a low-cost option."
  • More OneTrust DataGovernance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.
    Top Answer:The pricing and licensing for the product are quite expensive. Some advanced features are included in the E5 licensing, and it might be beneficial to see some of those features integrated into E3 to… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time. Currently, the default limit for scans is a bit restrictive, and reducing the time it takes… more »
    Top Answer:One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly.
    Top Answer:The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    1,292
    Comparisons
    962
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,307
    Rating
    7.8
    23rd
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    1,585
    Comparisons
    1,386
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    246
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Information Protection
    Learn More
    Overview

    Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

    MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Organizations can leverage the OneTrust Data Governance solution to centralize and automate their data governance programs. From initial data discovery to business insights, OneTrust helps you know your data, the laws that apply, and how to use that information to provide business value and demonstrate compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Anthony Nolan, Everis, Herman Miller, Provident Financial Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. OneTrust DataGovernance
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. OneTrust DataGovernance and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Purview Information Protection is ranked 6th in Data Governance with 5 reviews while OneTrust DataGovernance is ranked 23rd in Data Governance with 3 reviews. Microsoft Purview Information Protection is rated 7.8, while OneTrust DataGovernance is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Information Protection writes "Provides protection across multiple environments, can classify data and represent it graphically, and has the option for customer-managed teams to encrypt and manage data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust DataGovernance writes "Good cloud-based solution requiring improvement in terms of integration". Microsoft Purview Information Protection is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Microsoft Defender XDR, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, whereas OneTrust DataGovernance is most compared with Microsoft Purview, BigID, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, Varonis Platform and Informatica Axon. See our Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs. OneTrust DataGovernance report.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.