Compare MySQL vs. Teradata

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MySQL Logo
Read 17 MySQL reviews.
12,223 views|10,189 comparisons
Teradata Logo
21,482 views|15,793 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is very simple. It's easy to use. That's the most important feature.""The solution is free to use, which is its most valuable aspect.""The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup.""Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database.""MySQL is open-source. There are a lot of open-source communities trying to come up with their own patches, and to come up with their own features, which help MySQL develop faster than traditional databases like Oracle, which is closed source.""This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable.""This product is a good teaching tool for students who want to learn about networked databases.""This is a lightweight product that is not demanding on the resources, which is what I think gives it the edge."

More MySQL Pros »

"The feature that we find most valuable is its ability to perform Massive Parallel Processing.""The most valuable features are the Shared-nothing architecture and data protection functionality.""It is a stable program.""The functionality of the solution is excellent."

More Teradata Pros »

Cons
"The replication needs improvement. It's becoming a native cloud product like Oracle DB or Cockroach DB.""From a user perspective, the initial setup could be simplified a bit.""I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a little bit more efficient.""Oracle should start putting in some of the enterprise features in the standard feature. There are some key features that should be part of the standard.""They should come up with a better solution than the NDB cluster for better scaling. If they could come up with a better solution for write scaling, apart from the NDB cluster, which is supported by all open source communities, that would be great. Although the NDB cluster, I believe, is an open-source tool, it's not widely supported as a solution.""In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release, one thing that's always missing is dash boarding. There's no real BI tool for MySQL, like there is in Yellowfin and all the different tools that you get. They all have MySQL connectors, but there's no specific BI tool for MySQL. These open source projects have sprung up, but they're more general purpose.""The documentation is pretty weak and should be improved.""The product is a little bit complex and it is difficult to find sufficient documentation."

More MySQL Cons »

"I would like to see an improved Knowledge Base on the web.""The user interface needs to be improved.""An additional feature I would you like to see included in the next release, is that it needs to be more cloud-friendly.""I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."

More Teradata Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge.""This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge.""It's an open-source database management system that can be used free of charge.""Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference.""This product has a good price point."

More MySQL Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space."

More Teradata Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup.
Top Answer: So we jumped from version 5.6 to 5.7. That's not the latest version. The latest version is 5.8. We didn't move to eight for the simple reason that there's lots of code-based on 5.7 and there's no… more »
Top Answer: What it would compare it to, from my point of view would be, Microsoft SQL Studio. I find the Microsoft solution a bit better. But mostly in terms of the UI layout, I would say. I just find it a… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
Views
12,223
Comparisons
10,189
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
839
Avg. Rating
7.8
6th
Views
21,482
Comparisons
15,793
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
159
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Oracle
Teradata
Overview

Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

Offer
Learn more about MySQL
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.Netflix
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University17%
Non Tech Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
Computer Software Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider25%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Retailer7%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider33%
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Financial Services Firm11%
Logistics Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business46%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise34%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise66%
Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MySQL is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 17 reviews while Teradata is ranked 6th in Relational Databases with 4 reviews. MySQL is rated 7.8, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Good data warehousing, scalable, and offers good functionality". MySQL is most compared with Oracle Database, Firebird SQL, CockroachDB, IBM Db2 Database and SQL Server, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Exadata, Snowflake, Amazon Redshift and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics. See our MySQL vs. Teradata report.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.