Compare Nakivo vs. VMware SRM

Nakivo is ranked 9th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 8 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 7th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 9 reviews. Nakivo is rated 8.8, while VMware SRM is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Nakivo writes "The quick and easy setup of the ready-made virtual appliance made it simple to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "Enables us to get a lot of server images successfully but it has connectivity issues with auto-recovery". Nakivo is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Backup, Vembu BDR Suite and Arcserve UDP, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Veritas Resiliency Platform and Datrium DRaaS. See our Nakivo vs. VMware SRM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Nakivo Logo
6,427 views|5,149 comparisons
VMware SRM Logo
10,688 views|7,795 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Nakivo vs. VMware SRM and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise.Its features help us to have a backup of our volumes using the native technology of NetApp ONTAP. That way, we don't have to invest in other solutions for our backup requirement. Also, it helps us to replicate the data to another geographic location so that helps us to save on the costs of backup products.They have very good support team who is very helpful. They will help you with every aspect of getting the deployment done.One of the most valuable features is its similarity to the physical app, which makes it familiar. It's almost identical to a real NetApp, which means you can run all of the associated NetApp processes and services with it. Otherwise, we would definitely have to deploy some hardware on a site somewhere, which could be a challenge in terms of CapEx.This solution provides a unified storage, no matter what kind of data you have.We are definitely in the process of reducing our footprint on our secondary data center and all those snapshots technically reduce tape backup. That's from the protection perspective, but as far as files, it's much easier to use and manage and it's faster, too.The most valuable feature of this solution is that it makes our data readily available and we don't have to go through a lot of trouble to access it.The fast recovery time objective with the ability to bring the environment back to production in case something happens.

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pros »

It is fast, simple, powerful, and has a price without competition.Nakivo gives users confidence in knowing that if something happens with their application server, exchange server, or other applications, they can recover it easily and quickly.Perfect for someone who doesn't want to waste time.We spend less time to get data recovered.Creating a backup task in NAKIVO is fast and easy.This solution was surprisingly easy to configure.

More Nakivo Pros »

The most valuable feature is the simplicity of operations.The most valuable features are the disaster recovery and testing.The most valuable feature is disaster recovery testing.The product is evolving and the vendor is committed to change.Its capability to schedule, write and configure the recovery and scheduled steps, such that you don't have to come in and start manually trying to recover the entire machine. You just push a button to recover the VMware and everything is done.It's easy to use and the interface is quite simple.The most valuable feature is the integration with our Nutanix environment.The replication is the solution's most valuable feature. If we have some issues on the VM in the main site we can migrate it to another site automatically.

More VMware SRM Pros »

Cons
I would like NetApp to come up with an easier setup for the solution.The automated deployment was a bit complex using the public APIs. When we had to deploy Cloud Volumes ONTAP on a regular basis using automation, It could be a bit of a challenge.We want to be able to add more than six disks in aggregate, but there is a limit of the number of disks in aggregate. In GCP, they provide less by limiting the sixth disk in aggregate. In Azure, the same solution provides 12 disks in an aggregate versus GCP where it is just half that amount. They should bump up the disk in aggregate requirement so we don't have to migrate the aggregate from one to another when the capacities are full.There is room for improvement with the capacity. There's a very hard limit to how many disks you can have and how much space you can have. That is something they should work to fix, because it's limiting. Right now, the limit is about 360 terabytes or 36 disks.The solution is very expensive. Due to its design, It's not cost-efficient versus doing a physical environment of similar size.I think the challenge now is more in terms of keeping an air gap. The notion that it is in the cloud, easy to break, etc. The challenge now is mostly about the air gap and how we can protect that in the cloud.We would like to have support for high availability in multi-regions.The integration wizard requires a bit of streamlining. There are small things that misconfigure or repeat the deployment that will create errors, specifically in Azure.

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Cons »

I would like to have the option of creating a subfolder per job in the backup repository because we had an issue where some files were corrupted and we lost the backup of the majority of the VMs.We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression.It is missing the file and folder backup; however, this product is meant for virtual machine backup and recovery, so that is really outside of the scope of the software.An improvement would be to include a general data backup solution that is not only for virtual machines.I think it is important to work not only in replicating the virtual machines in Amazon AWS, but in other cloud systems.An improvement would be to give us more control over the email alerts, with different emails going to different addresses based on a set of rules.

More Nakivo Cons »

The two vCenters have to be synchronized, which sometimes gives us problems because Keberos does not tolerate more than five minutes in time difference.The interface is not easy to use and can be made more user-friendly.The configuration process could be improved.There are many functionality problems with the product currently. It is also slow and unstable.What I think can be improved is the data replication aspect.Cost is definitely an area where the product could be improved.You need a lot of knowledge to work with the interface because it is not really easy to use, and it would be great if the dashboard were simplified.If you have a failover case, you need to work on it manually. It would be helpful if this could be automated. It would simplify things.

More VMware SRM Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have.They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy.They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product.For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA.Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost.Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs.

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice »

I advise that this is the best product for medium or small environments according to my cost-benefit analysis.Pricing is easy to understand and very affordable.It's really cheap, and our company saves a significant amount of money on IT backup solutions per year.The price is not a problem in NAKIVO, as it is the most competitive in the market.It has a much higher bang for the buck than other products we evaluated.

More Nakivo Pricing and Cost Advice »

The price of this solution is on the expensive side.

More VMware SRM Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 72% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVOVMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager
Learn
NetApp
Nakivo
VMware
Overview

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides image-based, application-aware, and forever-incremental backup for VMware, Hyper-V, and AWS EC2 VMs. This means that NAKIVO Backup & Replication can capture all VM data, ensure the  consistency of applications and databases (such as Exchange, Active Directory, MS SQL, SharePoint) running in VMs, and transfer only changes to the backup repository. NAKIVO Backup & Replication uses native change tracking
technologies (VMware CBT/Hyper-V RCT) to instantly identify changed data. For each VM backup, you can save up to 1,000 recovery points and rotate them on a daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly basis.

VMware Site Recovery Manager is the industry-leading solution to enable application availability and mobility across sites in private cloud environments. Site Recovery Manager allows: Fast and reliable IT disaster recovery, simple and policy-based management, zero-downtime application mobility, and up to 50% lower TCO.
Offer
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage

Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.

Learn more about Nakivo
Learn more about VMware SRM
Sample Customers
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, United States Military Academy West Point, Greenpeace, China Airlines, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, FujifilmAcorda Therapeutics, Columbia Sportswear, Mainfreight, Nippon Express, Sin Chew Media, Fisher & Paykel, Siam City Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company39%
Manufacturing Company15%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Software R&D Company24%
Media Company6%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company20%
Retailer13%
Comms Service Provider7%
Construction Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company47%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise82%
REVIEWERS
Small Business57%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise14%
REVIEWERS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Nakivo vs. VMware SRM and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
427,071 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.