We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"The setup is easy."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
