Noms [EOL] vs SQLite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Salesforce Logo
views| comparisons
SQLite Logo
1,830 views|1,809 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Noms [EOL] and SQLite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed Open Source Databases Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten."
  • "The tool is open-source."
  • "It's a good value."
  • "It's not expensive."
  • More SQLite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I use Flutter Technology with the JSF plugin.
    Top Answer:I primarily use SQLite for small-scale applications due to its limitations in storing large amounts of data. For larger-scale projects, I typically opt for MySQL or other alternatives. Storing a large… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Open Source Databases
    9th
    Views
    1,830
    Comparisons
    1,809
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Firebird SQL logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    PostgreSQL logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Oracle Berkeley DB logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Learn More
    Salesforce
    Video Not Available
    SQLite
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Noms is a decentralized database philosophically descendant from the Git version control system.

    Like Git, Noms is:

    Versioned: By default, all previous versions of the database are retained. You can trivially track how the database evolved to its current state, easily and efficiently compare any two versions, or even rewind and branch from any previous version.

    Synchronizable: Instances of a single Noms database can be disconnected from each other for any amount of time, then later reconcile their changes efficiently and correctly.

    Unlike Git, Noms is a database, so it also:

    Primarily stores structured data, not files and directories (see: the Noms type system)

    Scales well to large amounts of data and concurrent clients (TODO: benchmarks)

    Supports atomic transactions (a single instance of Noms is CP, but Noms is typically run in production backed by S3, in which case it is "effectively CA")

    Supports efficient indexes (see: Noms prolly-trees)

    Features a flexible query model (see: GraphQL)

    Finally, because Noms is content-addressed, it yields a very pleasant programming model.

    Working with Noms is declarative. You don't INSERT new data, UPDATE existing data, or DELETE old data. You simply declare what the data ought to be right now. If you commit the same data twice, it will be deduplicated because of content-addressing. If you commit almost the same data, only the part that is different will be written.

    SQLite is an open-source, serverless, reliable, and flexible, SQL database engine. It is particularly favored in the realm of embedded database solutions and small to medium-sized projects. Unlike traditional database systems that operate on a client-server model, SQLite is a serverless database engine, meaning it runs directly within the application it powers. This unique architecture makes SQLite an ideal choice for applications where simplicity, efficiency, and minimal configuration are paramount.

    SQLite is an embedded database engine, which means it operates directly within the application that uses it, without requiring a separate server process. It is designed to be cross-platform, supporting multiple operating systems, and is is compatible with a wide range of programming languages, such as C, C++, Python, Java, and more. This makes it highly portable and suitable for a wide range of applications, from mobile devices to desktop software and web applications.

    The key advantages of SQLite is its reliability, the lightweight nature and efficient performance. It has a small footprint, typically requiring only a few megabytes of disk space, and can operate entirely in memory if needed. It is designed to be reliable and robust, with built-in features such as atomic commit and rollback, which ensure data integrity even in the event of system crashes or power failures. Finally, the SQLite solution requires no configuration or setup, making it easy to use and deploy. It can be embedded directly into applications without the need for complex installation or configuration procedures.

      SQLite Functionality

      • SQL Compliance: SQLite supports a substantial portion of the SQL standard, including features like transactions, triggers, views, and indexes.
      • File-based Storage: SQLite stores its entire database as a single cross-platform file on the host machine's file system.
      • ACID Compliance: SQLite fully supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, ensuring data consistency and integrity in concurrent access scenarios.

      SQLite is an open-source project distributed under a public domain license, which means it can be used, modified, and distributed freely, without any licensing costs or restrictions.

      To summarize, SQLite is widely used in various applications, including web browsers (e.g., Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome), mobile applications (e.g., Android, iOS), embedded systems, and desktop software. Its simplicity, portability, and efficiency make it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight and reliable database solution, especially in resource-constrained environments or applications with modest data storage needs.

      Sample Customers
      Information Not Available
      Oracle, Bloomberg, Bentley, Mozilla
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company20%
      Comms Service Provider16%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      University7%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business56%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise33%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business28%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise56%
      Buyer's Guide
      Open Source Databases
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and others in Open Source Databases. Updated: March 2024.
      768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Noms [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Open Source Databases while SQLite is ranked 9th in Open Source Databases with 7 reviews. Noms [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SQLite is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQLite writes "Good for scenarios where you need offline capabilities within your mobile applications, stable and useful plugin". Noms [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SQLite is most compared with Firebird SQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MySQL and Oracle Berkeley DB.

      See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

      We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.