Objective ECM vs Saperion comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Objective Logo
547 views|501 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Hyland Logo
323 views|199 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Objective ECM and Saperion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
547
Comparisons
501
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
323
Comparisons
199
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Hyland Saperion, Hyland Saperion ECM, Saperion ECM
Learn More
Hyland
Video Not Available
Overview

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Saperion ECM helps you improve efficiency and fulfill compliance requirements — even when managing information trapped in unstructured documents such as invoices and emails.  Saperion automates document capture, processing, management and archiving, and allows immediate content retrieval throughout the enterprise.  It supports legal, operational and regulatory requirements. Security permissions ensure that only authorized users access the information they need.  Saperion enables seamless application integrations to help you adapt to ever-changing business needs.

Sample Customers
ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government33%
Financial Services Firm9%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Insurance Company12%
Real Estate/Law Firm12%
Government10%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business57%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise29%
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Objective ECM is ranked 17th in Enterprise Content Management while Saperion is ranked 21st in Enterprise Content Management. Objective ECM is rated 4.0, while Saperion is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Objective ECM writes "The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Saperion writes "I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine". Objective ECM is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Content Manager and Atlassian Confluence, whereas Saperion is most compared with Hyland OnBase.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.