OpenText GroupWise vs Return Path .EQ Suite [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText GroupWise and Return Path .EQ Suite [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Email Applications Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was a part of the suite, so it was very cost-effective. There were no costs beyond the licensing fee."
  • "Micro Focus GroupWise is the most affordable solution on-premises. Versus Microsoft Exchange on-premises, pricing is 20:1, so there's no comparison. Micro Focus GroupWise is cheaper, though, for my clients, it's not about the cost but the stability and security of the solution."
  • More OpenText GroupWise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the ease of logging best in Micro Focus GroupWise. I also like its proxy capabilities from a user level. I also like how secure Micro Focus GroupWise is.
    Top Answer:Micro Focus GroupWise is the most affordable solution on-premises. Versus Microsoft Exchange on-premises, pricing is 20:1, so there's no comparison. Micro Focus GroupWise is cheaper, though, for my… more »
    Top Answer:What I don't like about Micro Focus GroupWise is the removal of the Unix client. Micro Focus took that function away about ten years ago because there wasn't enough demand for it. Other solutions also… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 24 in Email Applications
    Views
    920
    Comparisons
    468
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    588
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Email Applications
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus GroupWise, GroupWise
    .EQ Suite
    Learn More
    Return Path
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Collaboration solution that offers support for any communication over intranets, extranets and the Internet.
    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Heritage Oaks Bank
    Cloudmark, Cedar Fair, CruisesOnly, MyVoucherCodes, Noria, Trade Me, Publishers Clearing House, Identity Direct, Blocket
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    University6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise45%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Email Applications
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText GroupWise is ranked 10th in Email Applications with 3 reviews while Return Path .EQ Suite [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Email Applications. OpenText GroupWise is rated 9.0, while Return Path .EQ Suite [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText GroupWise writes "It has proxy capabilities, is secure, and allows easy logging". On the other hand, OpenText GroupWise is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft Exchange Online, Zimbra Collaboration and HCL Notes, whereas Return Path .EQ Suite [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.