• Home
  • OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] vs. Sitecore Experience Manager

OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] vs Sitecore Experience Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] and Sitecore Experience Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL]?
Anonymous User
It's a CMS with the usual features and functions. It was an old version and for us to move to a newer version we had to take three separate projects with each one incurring significant cost.
Ranking
Unranked
In Web Content Management
8th
out of 48 in Web Content Management
Views
868
Comparisons
600
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sitecore XM
Learn More
OpenText
Sitecore
Overview

OpenText Web Experience Management is an enterprise-grade solution for creating and managing compelling web content across all organizational, end-user-centric touch points - intranet or extranet, public or private. The digital-first enterprise understands the importance of standardizing on a transaction-oriented solution that is robust enough to scale across the organization but is also responsive to the business requirements of most content marketers - especially with the high demands in mobile, social, and video today.

For those who want a robust CMS without all the digital marketing power of the Sitecore Experience Platform (XP), the Sitecore Experience Manager (XM) empowers you to deliver the right content, to the right person, exactly at the right time.

Sample Customers
Barcelona City Council, Hyatt, Junta de Andalucia, People's United Bank
easyJet, Toshiba, Thomas Cook Travel Group, Oxfam, New York Life, Jabra, Graf von Faber-Castell, Canon, Boy Scouts of America
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization32%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company7%
Real Estate/Law Firm4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise40%
Large Enterprise39%
Buyer's Guide
Web Content Management
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management while Sitecore Experience Manager is ranked 8th in Web Content Management. OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Sitecore Experience Manager is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sitecore Experience Manager writes "It's a CMS with the usual features and functions. It was an old version and for us to move to a newer version we had to take three separate projects with each one incurring significant cost". OpenText Web Experience Management [EOL] is most compared with OpenText TeamSite and FirstSpirit Enterprise CMS, whereas Sitecore Experience Manager is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, Magnolia CMS, CoreMedia and Liferay Digital Experience Platform.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.