We performed a comparison between Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."Oracle is a very useful tool in terms of usability and customization."
"The most valuable feature is that it offers several adaptors."
"The solution is pretty straightforward to setup and use."
"We are not using any features offered by OCI but only using virtual machines. So our data only syncs from our On-premises to cloud. The compute and performance are better than other cloud solutions."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases."
"We use the solution for EC2. It helps me to create around six servers for free to test out things. It also provides me with an authenticated cloud nameserver. We also use it as a wireguard endpoint."
"The product helps us to use it as a central ERP and HCM."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The framework from AWS is so good, I would like to see this feature in OCI."
"Oracle Cloud's support could be improved because its second-line support has weak engineers who handle stuff a little bit slowly."
"Amazon AWS has a better solution overall."
"Oracle support could be better; we had cases where certain regions experienced specific issues and received little help from Oracle."
"The product could use some more development and maturity so it has more peripheral functionality already integrated."
"Managed services for Postgres are not available in Oracle Cloud."
"Database instances and computer storage are areas with shortcomings in the product that need improvement."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 91 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
