We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."I like the containerization of Azure."
"The solution is very good. It's very full. You can do almost anything."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"I like how fast I can develop an application and put it in production with PowerApps. I think the integration is also excellent. The platforms is growing, so they are constantly adding more connectors on all these things."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"It allows us to provide all the information in one single place."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"We would like to see the period for viewing executions within this solution to be extended beyond its current limit of 28 days. We would prefer to be able to offer our customers an infinite amount of history to search."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not responsive in nature."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"The solution is evolving very fast and every month new features are introduced. Sometimes it's difficult to catch up with all the evolution that's happening. I had to focus on Power BI for a while and left PowerApps at the side for a couple of months and when I came back, it had changed its interface and moved components around."
"It's easy to use."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
"The solution should move to the next step in its maturity model and include mobile versions for Android and iOS."
"Installation and integration could be improved."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 3 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.