We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools."The most valuable feature is automation."
"It's very clever."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the integration with other solutions in data quality."
"It's very convenient and very innovative."
"SAP HANA is a stable solution."
"The in-memory computing and the efficient response time are very good features."
"The main feature is that the processes are very flexible, they are able to be adapted to the business and their departments."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It usually takes around eight months but it depends on a customer's requirements. We can spend a month or two customizing."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"It is challenging to integrate it with third-party tools."
"I would have rated the solution higher if this version was not missing some key features the newer version has."
"The releases need to be more stable. It's surprising to still encounter significant bugs after ten years of the product being available."
"The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help."
"The initial setup was very, very complex, tedious, and costly and required someone with great expertise to complete it."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"I'd just like to see some more improvements done on the training, both on the functional training and technical training sides as a part of the complete solution."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, Oracle Database, SQL Server, Apache Derby and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.