Compare Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA

Oracle Multitenant is ranked 15th in Relational Databases with 3 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 11 reviews. Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Enables you to stop and start each application without impacting others". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, IBM Db2 and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database and Oracle Database In-Memory. See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Multitenant Logo
1,697 views|1,040 comparisons
SAP HANA Logo
10,627 views|8,733 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Multitenant? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us.The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable featureThe most valuable features are the speed and ease of use.

Read more »

The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast.The user interface is very good. You can do any kind of reporting analytics from the platform.The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database.The functionality is of the solution is very good.One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory.Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for.The most value for us was in terms of using it to issue tenders online. We host our server, but it is open to the public, so clients who want to buy those tenders were able to go online, put their tender documents up, and we could evaluate them using SAP.If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy.

Read more »

Cons
It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it.That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve.The user interface for this solution can be made better.

Read more »

Unlike other databases, it lacks management features that legacy databases like Oracle or SQL servers have. They need to make the solution easier to manage and offer tools that make management more effective. A lot of things you have on traditional databases you have to develop into HANA.When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems.I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement.The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help.If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great.FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM.The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it.In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have.This solution is a little bit pricey.

Read more »

People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
1,697
Comparisons
1,040
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
404
Avg. Rating
8.3
4th
Views
10,627
Comparisons
8,733
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
429
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Oracle Pluggable DatabaseSAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn
Oracle
SAP
Overview

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard. p>

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Multitenant
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-TelecomUnilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company25%
Government13%
Construction Company13%
Wholesaler/Distributor13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company37%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
398,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.