Compare Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Multitenant Logo
1,803 views|1,030 comparisons
SAP HANA Logo
10,252 views|7,533 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature""Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us.""The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

More Oracle Multitenant Pros »

"One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory.""The functionality is of the solution is very good.""The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database.""The user interface is very good. You can do any kind of reporting analytics from the platform.""The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application. SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it.""The performance is very, very good. It's one of the best aspects of the solution.""We've had good experiences with technical support.""Its in-memory capabilities are good, which is why many companies still use it."

More SAP HANA Pros »

Cons
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve.""It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it.""This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

More Oracle Multitenant Cons »

"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great.""The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help.""I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement.""When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems.""The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept.""There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle.""The solution is very expensive for us.""SAP HANA is a very proprietary tool and there's not as much support available for it as there is for an SQL Server (which is more popular)."

More SAP HANA Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

More Oracle Multitenant Pricing and Cost Advice »

"People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?""It is expensive, which isn't a problem for us because SAP HANA is processing the data so fast.""SAP HANA is an expensive product.""It is expensive.""Setup and licensing require planning and proper budgeting, as it is not cheap.""The price of the solution could be reduced, it is expensive.""The price of this product is good.""We pay $200 on a monthly basis."

More SAP HANA Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The in-memory computing and the efficient response time are very good features.
Top Answer: We pay for a maintenance license, and the licensing cost is high. In general, it is a very expensive solution.
Top Answer: Because SAP HANA is completely in-memory, it requires the use of bigger systems which have a higher amount of RAM. If the system does go down then coming back up is difficult and can take 30 to 40… more »
Ranking
12th
Views
1,803
Comparisons
1,030
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
373
Rating
8.5
4th
Views
10,252
Comparisons
7,533
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
459
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle Pluggable Database
SAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANA
Learn More
Overview

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard. p>

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle Multitenant
Learn more about SAP HANA
Sample Customers
An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom
Unilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company Limited
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
Logistics Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise30%
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,919 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle Multitenant is ranked 12th in Relational Databases with 3 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 24 reviews. Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Enables you to stop and start each application without impacting others". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Very robust solution with good data access". Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, MariaDB, IBM Db2 Database, MySQL and CockroachDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, Apache Spark and Progress OpenEdge RDBMS. See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA report.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.