OWASP Zap vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Comparison

Sponsored
Veracode Read 21 Veracode reviews. 70,664 views\|37,885 comparisons	OWASP Zap Read 9 OWASP Zap reviews. 31,194 views\|21,496 comparisons	WhiteHat Sentinel 1,921 views\|1,610 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Karen Meohas

Information Assurance Manager at xMatters

Researched WhiteHat Sentinel but chose Veracode: Centralized view shows the status of all scans, and if I want more information about something, it's one click away

We have some major clients using Veracode. It saves us time when it comes to doing annual pen tests. When we say we're using Veracode and they are... Read more »

Balaji Senthiappan

Assistant Vice President at Hexaware Technologies Limited

Great at reporting vulnerabilities, helps with security, and reveals development threats well

Use WhiteHat Sentinel? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: January 2021.

Download now

455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive." More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »	"It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use.""OWASP Zap is free to use.""This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing.""This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge." More OWASP Zap Pricing and Cost Advice »	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx? Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more » Read all 6 answers Would you recommend Veracode? What are some of your use cases? Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more » Read all 3 answers Checkmarx vs SonarQube; SonarQube interoperability with Checkmarx or Veracode Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more » Read all 3 answers	What is the biggest difference between OWASP Zap and Qualys? Top Answer: por ahora estoy usando Owasp Zap, es muy intuitivo y sus reportes muy detallados, probe con burp suite pero no me… more » What do you like most about OWASP Zap? Top Answer: Automatic updates and pull request analysis. Read all 7 answers What needs improvement with OWASP Zap? Top Answer: The product is somewhat complicated and could be improved by simplifying it because you don't want to have to allocate… more » Read all 8 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Popular Comparisons
SonarQube vs. Veracode Compared 50% of the time. Checkmarx vs. Veracode Compared 16% of the time. Micro Focus Fortify on Demand vs. Veracode Compared 6% of the time. Coverity vs. Veracode Compared 4% of the time. HCL AppScan vs. Veracode Compared 3% of the time. See more Veracode competitors » + Add more products to compare	PortSwigger Burp vs. OWASP Zap Compared 65% of the time. Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner vs. OWASP Zap Compared 6% of the time. Qualys Web Application Scanning vs. OWASP Zap Compared 5% of the time. Fortify WebInspect vs. OWASP Zap Compared 3% of the time. See more OWASP Zap competitors » + Add more products to compare	SonarQube vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Compared 20% of the time. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Compared 9% of the time. WhiteSource vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Compared 8% of the time. Checkmarx vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Compared 8% of the time. Qualys Web Application Scanning vs. WhiteHat Sentinel Compared 6% of the time. See more WhiteHat Sentinel competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
		WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing
Learn
Veracode	OWASP	WhiteHat Security
Overview
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.	Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free, open-source penetration testing tool being maintained under the umbrella of the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). ZAP is designed specifically for testing web applications and is both flexible and extensible.	WhiteHat Sentinel delivers a proven, scalable, and affordable enterprise application security platform, accelerating the identification and remediation of Web application security vulnerabilities
Offer
Learn more about Veracode Learn More	Learn more about OWASP Zap Learn More	Learn more about WhiteHat Sentinel Learn More
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner	Information Not Available	StreetCred Software, ReachLocal
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm32% Insurance Company11% Computer Software Company8% Engineering Company5% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company35% Comms Service Provider16% Financial Services Firm8% Manufacturing Company5%	REVIEWERS Computer Software Company25% Retailer13% Manufacturing Company13% Transportation Company13% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider23% Media Company6% Government5%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider10% Healthcare Company8% Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business22% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise53% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise20% Large Enterprise60%	REVIEWERS Small Business18% Midsize Enterprise24% Large Enterprise59%	No Data Available

OWASP Zap is ranked 6th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews while WhiteHat Sentinel is ranked 21st in Application Security Testing (AST). OWASP Zap is rated 7.4, while WhiteHat Sentinel is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Inexpensive licensing, free to use, and has good community support". On the other hand, OWASP Zap is most compared with PortSwigger Burp, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Fortify WebInspect, whereas WhiteHat Sentinel is most compared with SonarQube, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, WhiteSource, Checkmarx and Qualys Web Application Scanning.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sponsored
Veracode Read 21 Veracode reviews. 70,664 views\|37,885 comparisons	OWASP Zap Read 9 OWASP Zap reviews. 31,194 views\|21,496 comparisons	WhiteHat Sentinel 1,921 views\|1,610 comparisons

Compare OWASP Zap vs. WhiteHat Sentinel