SpiderOak vs ownCloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ownCloud Logo
158 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SpiderOak Logo
324 views|305 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ownCloud and SpiderOak based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
158
Comparisons
117
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 48 in Cloud Storage
Views
324
Comparisons
305
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
SpiderOak
Video Not Available
Overview
Software suite that provides a location-independent storage area for data (cloud storage). ownCloud can be installed on a private server at no additional cost.
SpiderOak is a cloud-based data storage center where users can securely retrieve files from any device. The service is designed to keep data private while letting it be opened and synced across multiple computers and mobile devices. Its zero-knowledge policy assures the user that the information cannot be attained by unauthorized users, not even SpiderOak staff. SpiderOak cloud services are automatically backed up so changes and edits are immediately saved. Changes made to data can be synced in full or in part and can be shared with other users through SpiderOak, using their password protected ShareRooms. Users have the advantage of accessing data from any device within the SpiderOak network either by phone, tablet, or web browser. Lastly, data can be stored with SpiderOak from multiple operating systems _ Mac, Windows, and Linux _ in addition to storing data from external hard drives. The privacy guaranteed by SpiderOak means no one, even with server access, can read file or folder names. Unlike encryption keys stored with customer data, SpiderOak's passwords cannot be decrypted or recovered; no information about a user's unique encryption key is kept on file. SpiderOak has been used by numerous businesses for cloud secure data. A large multi-national organization used the cloud service to backup millions of desktops, including those with limited online connectivity. SpiderOak helped the organization maintain access to local files, work within local compliance requirements, and control potential data leaks.
Sample Customers
CERN, Joy Global, Sciebo, Bauhaus, datto
The Guardian
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ownCloud is ranked 17th in Content Collaboration Platforms while SpiderOak is ranked 14th in Cloud Storage. ownCloud is rated 10.0, while SpiderOak is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of ownCloud writes "Self-hosted file sync tool used to deploy custom web UIs. ". On the other hand, ownCloud is most compared with Kiteworks, whereas SpiderOak is most compared with Tresorit and Dropbox.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.