Ram BalajiPre-sales Engineer at VFM Systems And Services
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive."
"The price could be better."
AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.
The ThreatConnect Platform was designed to help you understand adversaries, automate workflows, and mitigate threats using threat intelligence. ThreatConnect offers a suite of products built on platform of analytics and automation.
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while ThreatConnect is ranked 11th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while ThreatConnect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect writes "Ease to use, customizable, and they have responsive and knowledgeable support". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and ThreatStream, whereas ThreatConnect is most compared with Anomali Enterprise, ThreatQ, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Splunk Phantom. See our Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.