Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it.""ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."

More ThreatConnect Pros »

Cons
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"Integration is an area that could use some improvement.""They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"

More ThreatConnect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive.""The price could be better."

More ThreatConnect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: The price could be better. ThreatConnect is very expensive for a single user, but it maybe affordable for companies.
Top Answer: They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community. Right now, it's a little complex to share with them or to download your events in a report. The price… more »
Ranking
Views
1,104
Comparisons
749
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
385
Rating
8.0
Views
3,256
Comparisons
2,549
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

The ThreatConnect Platform was designed to help you understand adversaries, automate workflows, and mitigate threats using threat intelligence. ThreatConnect offers a suite of products built on platform of analytics and automation.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about ThreatConnect
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
GoDaddy, BWM Outcomes, LLC, ND-ISAC, Zurich NA, Raytheon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider21%
Computer Software Company18%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while ThreatConnect is ranked 11th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while ThreatConnect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect writes "Ease to use, customizable, and they have responsive and knowledgeable support". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and ThreatStream, whereas ThreatConnect is most compared with Anomali Enterprise, ThreatQ, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Splunk Phantom. See our Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. ThreatConnect report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.