We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and USM Anywhere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."The feature that I like best is the dashboard."
"It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security."
"The most valuable feature is alerting."
"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic."
"We had used previous products and found AlienVault centralized the logging for our security."
"The most valuable feature is threat intelligence."
"Allowed us to help our customers satisfy compliance needs around logging and monitoring."
"OTX is a great module that lets staff maintain and monitor updates regarding events in the infrastructure and takes decision to improve the security perimeter."
"The new cloud-based panel is excellent both for client review as well as for our SOC to review and respond to threats. It is much easier to configure and use than the previous solution from AlienVault."
"This is a USM, so being able to get all the features under one roof makes it a good product with good new features."
"The solution has all the features that we need, however they do not work correctly."
"The ease of implementation is the most valuable feature."
"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution."
"It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."
"It is a completely cloud-based product at present."
"I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate."
"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring."
"AlienVault cannot automatically respond to threats like other SIEM solutions, such as Sentinel and LogRhythm. Most of our clients are far away, so it's often challenging to handle alerts when they come up on our dashboard."
"It should be able to communicate with other security solutions to stop threats."
"The price of AT&T AlienVault USM could be reduced."
"As this software is in the cloud, you do not have control on updates and general changes which are happening."
"There are many reports included but would be nice to have better access to the data."
"For creating new rules, you have to be familiar with regular expressions. I feel there could be something built-in to make sure that process is easier."
"The solution already has quite good tools, however, they need better integration tools for linking with Office 365, Google Suite, and so on."
"they seem to have bugs from time to time that go unfixed for a while and that is frustrating. I'm not saying the product needs to be bug-free, but they need to be responsive to bugs."
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while USM Anywhere is ranked 11th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 113 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8, while USM Anywhere is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of USM Anywhere writes "Easy to use and affordable". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid, whereas USM Anywhere is most compared with Wazuh, AlienVault OSSIM, IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.