Compare Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work.""The pricing is very good.""The automation is excellent.""The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros »

"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it.""ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."

More ThreatConnect Pros »

Cons
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added.""The user interface could be a bit better.""When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot.""There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons »

"Integration is an area that could use some improvement.""They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"

More ThreatConnect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products.""There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this product is in the mid-range, not too expensive, nor inexpensive.""The price could be better."

More ThreatConnect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: The licensing is paid on a yearly basis. It is quite expensive. When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot.
Top Answer: ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: The price could be better. ThreatConnect is very expensive for a single user, but it maybe affordable for companies.
Top Answer: They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community. Right now, it's a little complex to share with them or to download your events in a report. The price… more »
Ranking
Views
10,758
Comparisons
8,583
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
459
Rating
8.3
Views
3,256
Comparisons
2,549
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
282
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

The ThreatConnect Platform was designed to help you understand adversaries, automate workflows, and mitigate threats using threat intelligence. ThreatConnect offers a suite of products built on platform of analytics and automation.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Learn more about ThreatConnect
Sample Customers
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
GoDaddy, BWM Outcomes, LLC, ND-ISAC, Zurich NA, Raytheon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 5 reviews while ThreatConnect is ranked 8th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.2, while ThreatConnect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "User-friendly and robust with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect writes "Ease to use, customizable, and they have responsive and knowledgeable support". Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, ServiceNow Security Operations and ​RSA NetWitness SecOps Manager, whereas ThreatConnect is most compared with Anomali Enterprise, ThreatQ, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Cisco Threat Grid. See our Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. ThreatConnect report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.