Most Helpful Review
Enables us to automatically submit each new build for scanning and get results directly into our JIRA
Find out what your peers are saying about PortSwigger Burp vs. Qualys Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,828 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.
I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.
The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.
We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.
One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important.
It has an easy-to-use interface.
Veracode provides faster scans compared to other static analysis security testing tools.
It has almost completely eliminated the presence of SQLi vulnerabilities.
BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding.
The way they do the research and they keep their profile up to date is great. They identify vulnerabilities and update them immediately.
The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues.
Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it.
Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them.
This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps.
This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives.
"The product is very good just the way it is; It has everything already well established and functions great. I can't see any way for this current version to be improved."
With our vulnerabilities under control, it's putting our services in compliance and minimizing our risk for exposure.
The most valuable feature is that we are able to scan the services and put credentials like a user ID password. We can verify the vulnerability level.
It combines both web application vulnerability management and internal vulnerability management on one platform and dashboard. Usually, you have to purchase separate tools.
We can do scanning and submit reports straight to the customers when there are new vulnerabilities, then tell them whether they are affected or not.
Key features include: Cloud-based, so the installation is not so tedious. Easily deployed. Highly scalable. Comprehensive reporting.
You can integrate your Burp Suite results and create an integrated report. Also, the way it shows the results - threats and exploit details - makes remediation very easy.
QualysGuard web-based scanner is very useful for performing external penetration and PCI scans from remote locations.
By using QualysGuard, we are able to finish external scans with assured results in half the time.
One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.
Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.
I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.
Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.
We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time.
Veracode scans provide a higher number of false positives.
The overall reporting structure is complicated, and it's difficult to understand the report.
It needs more timely support for newer languages and framework versions.
The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors.
The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative.
The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution.
The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired.
I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory.
The scanner and crawler need to be improved.
There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual.
The Initial setup is a bit complex.
The solution needs to adjust its pricing. They should make it more affordable.
It should have better automatic reporting.
The area of false positives could be improved. There are quite a number of false positives as compared to other solutions. They could probably fine tune the algorithm to be able to reduce the number of false positives being detected.
In terms of the Policy Compliance model which they currently have, not all the platforms are being covered. If they could improve on the Policy Compliance model, since there are policies which are benchmarked against it, this will be helpful for us.
The GUI could be a little less complicated as it opens a lot of new windows for creating search lists, templates, reports, or for scanning purposes.
They should try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing.
In certain cases, this product does have false positives, which the company should work on.
Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.
They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.
Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.
No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.
It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.
I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.
Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.
I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.
There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable.
The yearly cost is about $300.
Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition.
Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year.
The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.
This is a value for money product.
Licensing was based on the number of assets that you want to scan on your network. You can also do licensing on subscription. On subscription, it is easier and more flexible. You tell Qualys that you want to move from the 1000 to 2000 band or the 3000 or 5000 band, then they will give you the quotation for it. Once you pay for it, applying the licensing is quite easy and effective.
Pricing was reasonable and competitive. It was not too far above the other products.
Qualys has an IT-based licensing based on a yearly license, which is a good way of handling it. However, in some cases, when we do the PCI scanning, the host will not like the scanning and we lose the IT license. So, this could be improved.
It is best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team, as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders.
Try the free trial of the product to understand the basic working mechanisms.
Compared 48% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 74% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Veracode is an application security company that offers an automated cloud-based service for securing web, mobile and third-party enterprise applications. Veracode provides multiple security analysis technologies on a single platform, including static analysis, dynamic analysis, mobile application behavioral analysis and software composition analysis.
Burp Suite is an integrated platform for performing security testing of web applications. Its various tools work seamlessly together to support the entire testing process, from initial mapping and analysis of an application's attack surface, through to finding and exploiting security vulnerabilities.
|Qualys Web Application Scanning (WAS) is a cloud service that provides automated crawling and testing of custom web applications to identify vulnerabilities including cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. The automated service enables regular testing that produces consistent results, reduces false positives, and easily scales to secure a large number of websites. Proactively scans websites for malware infections, sending alerts to website owners to help prevent black listing and brand reputation damage.|
Keep your software secure
Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.
Learn more about PortSwigger Burp
Learn more about Qualys Web Application Scanning
|State of Missouri, Rekner||Maven Security Consulting, OWASP Italy, Penetration Testing Firm||BskyB, Cartagena, ClearPoint Learning Systems, Connect Group, du, Fortrex Technologies, HBOR, HDI, Highlights for Children, The Lithuanian State Enterprise Centre of Registers, City of Miami Beach, Microsoft, MidlandHR, MSCI Inc., Northern Arizona University, Ofgem, Olympus Europa, PhoneFactor, RTL Nederland, ThousandEyes, VGZ Organisatie B.V.|
Financial Services Firm33%
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm8%
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm57%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company14%
Software R&D Company35%
Financial Services Firm10%