We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has an easy setup with clear instructions and helpful engineers. Deployment is seamless, although the time may vary. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring daily monitoring and maintenance, and it can take anywhere from a few hours to a month.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers a management console, compliance monitoring, and micro-segmentation, as well as auto-remediation capabilities and vulnerability scanning. Trend Micro Cloud One has excellent vulnerability protection and login inspection, as well as control over server access and application installation, and good workload management. Prisma Cloud needs more customizable dashboards, better automation, better coverage for GCP and Oracle, and improved support. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, Azure support, automation, robustness, initial setup, and alerts.
Pricing: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a convoluted credit-based pricing model that can be difficult to comprehend, although it is deemed pricey, it is deemed a good investment for safeguarding multi-cloud setups. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the mid-range and can be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. While extra services may accumulate, the overall cost is seen as fair and has even decreased by 25% in recent times.
Service and Support: Prisma Cloud has received mixed reviews, with some customers praising their technical support and account managers, while others experienced slow response times. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has generally received positive feedback for their knowledgeable and responsive support team.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides better risk clarity, faster issue detection, improved compliance, and increased productivity compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. However, Trend Micro Cloud One is more flexible and easier to integrate.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One based on user reviews. Prisma Cloud offers a wider range of features, including continuous cloud compliance monitoring, network security, and identity-based micro-segmentation, and provides a single pane of glass for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The two most valuable features are container security and the capability to discover workloads."
"The visibility on alerts helps you investigate more easily and see details faster."
"I find the CSPM area to be a more valuable and flexible feature."
"Most of the customers we are tackling have different tools and solutions, like Qualys, Nessus, and vulnerability management assessment solutions. There are plugins for them, and we can integrate Prisma Cloud with them. We can enrich our telemetry with their data and use the predefined correlation rules in Prisma Cloud. That means we have that work done in seconds."
"The first aspect that is important is the fact that Prisma Cloud is cloud-agnostic. It's actually available for the five top cloud providers: AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle, and Alibaba Cloud. The second aspect is the fact that we can write our own rules to try to detect misconfigurations in those environments."
"It helps to identify the misconfigurations by monitoring regularly which helps to secure the organization's cloud environment."
"The product provides very good network security."
"Prisma Cloud's monitoring features such as the compute compliance dashboard and the vulnerability dashboard, where we can get a clear visualization of their docker, have also been valuable. We can get layer-by-layer information that helps us see exactly where it's noncompliant. They update the dashboards quite frequently."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The security is good."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"Palo Alto should work on ease-of-use and the user-friendliness to be more competitive with some competing products."
"They charge seven workloads for monitoring one compute, and that is quite expensive. This makes it difficult to move fully with the compute part because of the workload."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"We had some teething issues with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but overall, it did what we expected."
"Getting new guys trained on using the solution requires some thought. If someone is already trained on Palo Alto then he's able to adapt quickly. But, if someone is coming from another platform such as Fortinet, or maybe he's from the system side, that is where we need some help. We need to find out if there is an online track or training that they can go to."
"Based on my experience, the customization—especially the interface and some of the product identification components—is not as customizable as it could be. But it makes up for that with the fact that we can access the API and then build our own systems to read the data and then process and parse it and hand it to our teams."
"There needs to be a mechanism that allows me to manually configure compliance more easily."
"The integration of the Compute function into the cloud monitoring function—because those are two different tools that are being combined together—could use some more work. It still feels a little bit disjointed."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 83 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and AWS GuardDuty, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and AWS Security Hub. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
