Pure Storage Pure1 [EOL] vs Tintri SyncVM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Pure Storage Pure1 [EOL] and Tintri SyncVM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Storage Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Storage Management
Unranked
In Storage Management
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Pure1® broke barriers with simple cloud-based management and effortless predictive support. Now it’s time for another breakthrough: introducing Pure1 Meta, the global predictive intelligence enabling our vision for self-driving storage.

SyncVM™ - Efficient Copy Data Management

Accelerate Application Development & Recovery

Application development teams today experience a slow and inefficient process when trying to refresh their VM-based environments with new production data as it requires copying data on the entire LUN, identifying target VMs within the snapshots, and reconfiguring existing VMs to use new data sets.

Tintri SyncVM accelerates application development with efficient copy data management, at a VM-level, in minutes, regardless of the VM size and with no loss of performance history.

Tintri SyncVM accelerates application development with efficient copy data management, at a VM-level, in minutes, regardless of the VM size and with no loss of performance history.

Sample Customers
Trespa, Ohio National Financial Services
That’s why leading enterprises including Comcast, Chevron, NASA, Toyota, United Healthcare and 20% of the Fortune 100, trust Tintri with storage needs.
Buyer's Guide
Storage Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell Technologies, NetApp and others in Storage Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Pure Storage Pure1 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management while Tintri SyncVM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Storage Management. Pure Storage Pure1 [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Tintri SyncVM [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Pure Storage Pure1 [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Tintri SyncVM [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Storage Management vendors.

We monitor all Storage Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.