We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"By clearly defining process owners, customers can not only better achieve their goals but are always accountable to partners and audits."
"The most valuable feature is the integration model."
"Being able to deploy in shorter cuts."
"The backend is great."
"The initial setup was simple. One can know how exactly the process performs just by clicking a few buttons."
"Everything is valuable. If you're looking at the process documentation feature, it's really easy to use. We have official training from Signavio trainers, but sometimes I do the training myself very shortly for our colleagues. In less than one or two hours, they are already able to model the business process themselves. The language is really easy. The user interface is really easy. If you're talking about process simulation, we have customers and clients internally who are using it a lot, because they are from logistics or operations. They have numbers and KPIs behind the process. They know their numbers, so they have to see how they can improve a given business processes with a change in the task sequence or a change in the numbers of KPIs. If you're talking about the process mining, it is integrated into the whole solution."
"It's easy to set up."
"I like the tool's ability to visualize the entire process flow, how the process flow flows, and what deviations happen from the process flow. It also helps to figure out the process bottlenecks."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"SAP Signavio Process Intelligence slows down when you feed a lot of data. It needs to improve its processing ability. The tool should also incorporate AI features that can automate things. Many of the competitors have this feature."
"There could be more standard interfaces for importing data from the various systems in the process landscape."
"It could be more scalable."
"The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey modeling feature."
"When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing."
"The UI could be improved."
"SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs."
"It should be able to convert business workflows into media documents quickly."
More SAP Signavio Process Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is ranked 6th in Process Mining with 13 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence writes "A scalable and stable tool that needs to provide its users with an exact focus on where process transformations can happen". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis, whereas SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is most compared with Celonis, UiPath Process Mining and Software AG ARIS Process Mining.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
