Most Helpful Review
We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needs
By using QC we broke down silos (of teams), improved the organization of our tests, have a much better view of the testing status, and became much quicker in providing test results with document generation.
The enhanced dashboards capabilities are useful for senior management to view the progress of releases under the portfolio in one go and also drill down to the graphs.
By standardizing our template, we publish reports at the business unit level.
The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities.
The feature I like most is the ease of reporting.
The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature.
The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT.
We would like to have support for agile development.
The support for automation with iOS applications can be better.
The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve.
They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive.
I feel that the licenses are expensive.
It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily.
Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details.
out of 33 in Test Management Tools
Average Words per Review
out of 52 in Functional Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
|Micro Focus Quality Center, HPE QC, HPE Quality Center||Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer|
|Micro Focus||Micro Focus|
Test more, test faster.
Eliminate poor quality releases and reduce the cost of rewriting applications with Micro Focus Quality Center.
Quality Center helps teams build and organize the testing effort, track progress throughout the application lifecycle, and is architected around testing best practices, asset fostering re-use. Teams can quickly build or import requirements and tests, execute enhanced manual testing, schedule and manage test-automation and manage defects throughout the lifecycle.
|SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.|
Learn more about Quality Center
Learn more about Silk Test
|Quality Center has over 5,000 customers including The Federal Administration, Bank Asya, CitiPower, Powercor, DB Systel, JetBlue, Seagate, Swiss Life, and NNE Pharmaplan.||Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies|
Financial Services Firm13%
Software R&D Company21%
Financial Services Firm10%
Software R&D Company43%
Comms Service Provider12%