We performed a comparison between QualiWare X and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."I like the solution's traceability."
"The product offers very good support for all mainstream modeling notations and architectural frameworks."
"It is an EA tool that is approved by Open Group. It is in the tool register of Open Group."
"A feature I like most about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is its ease of use."
"The most valuable feature of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is the value streams."
"It is a very rich tool in terms of the functionality, and the types of diagrams, that you can create in this tool."
"This is a useful tool for IT people who need to design their solution architecture."
"The solution saved a lot of time, about 30%."
"It has led some teams to do better code reviews - to be less focussed on coding conventions (syntax) and more focussed on the semantics because of the abstraction level clear design affords."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
"The templates for documentation should be enhanced to include complex documents such as template RFP, or Non functional requirements template."
"One room for improvement in Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is that it's not very friendly. Another room for improvement in the tool is that it doesn't enable you to import the metadata from a database very easily, so reverse engineering of a database was very difficult. Its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement."
"The areas of improvement should be focused on utility service such as producing better graphics, perhaps having a wider image library set and producing better models for working directly with customers."
"It took me a while to figure out how to use the report generation features effectively. So, it would be really nice if they had a way to make that a little bit more interactive and a little bit more straightforward."
"More challenging than other tools to maintain documents and document versions for an architecture board review."
"The modeling tool is targeted toward a sophisticated user."
"This solution has some limitations from a business perspective."
"The dashboard and connectivity could be improved."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
QualiWare X is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 97 reviews. QualiWare X is rated 7.6, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". QualiWare X is most compared with iServer, Avolution ABACUS and ARIS Cloud, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and LeanIX.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.