We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is the connection of threat intelligence information with identified vulnerabilities, which means you can prioritize vulnerabilities according to actual attacks."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Finding things in management can be quite difficult."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"Improve the API speed."
"The tool needs to improve the adding assets and report generation features. I would like to see the policy scan of offline appliances in the product's future releases."
"Qualys could improve the inbuilt dashboards."
"The only improvement I can think of is on the implementation side. At times it is a bit slow."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Panorays.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
