We performed a comparison between SecurityScorecard and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, OneTrust and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"Overall Zoom is a good solution."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the self-updating engine."
"Scanners and reports using CIS templates ("de-facto" standard, easy to fix and to locate correction tips at documentation), tests against cloud providers, database profiles, several types of telecom devices, and others highly customizable scans."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is the support it provides for any new vulnerabilities quickly."
"The automatic scanner and scheduler are pretty cool."
"Tenable Nessus is cheap and flexible."
"It gives a holistic view of your entire environment."
"The initial setup of Tenable Nessus is very easy."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"Nessus' reporting could be more user-friendly."
"The interface is a little bit clunky, and the reporting is not marvelous. There should be better integration of reporting between instances. Currently, the instance stands alone, and it produces a report. Being able to amalgamate those reports with another instance will be useful."
"The scalability of Tenable Nessus is good. However, it could be more flexible."
"There is room, overall, for improvement in the way it groups the workstations and the way it detects, when the vulnerability is scanned. Even when we would run a new scan, if it was an already existing vulnerability, it wouldn't put a new date on it."
"It would be a good idea if they have a simulation of attacks or a use case for finding a new vulnerability or dealing with a zero-day attack."
"The price could be reduced."
"Vulnerability recommendations are outdated and not in line with industry standards."
"Technically, it is an excellent and the best solution available in Libya. My only concern is related to its pricing. They are an emerging company in Libya, and they need to put in some effort to provide us with very good prices so that customers can go with the best solution. Chinese companies are getting into the market here, and they're providing very cheap solutions."
SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Rapid7 InsightVM and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Pentera.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.