We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Snyk based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Qualys VMDR is praised for its user-friendly interface, prioritization system, and customizable dashboard. It effectively addresses vulnerabilities and offers valuable scanning capabilities. Snyk users highlighted its developer-friendly approach, automatic pull requests, and software composition analysis features. Reviewers said Qualys VMDR could improve by offering more customization options and integrating more seamlessly with other systems. The interface could be clearer, and Qualys could enhance scanning capabilities for IoT and industrial control systems. Snyk should focus on improving compatibility, reporting, and automatic remediation.
Service and Support: Qualys VMDR's customer service is mostly considered accessible and responsive. However, some reviewers reported slow response times and expressed a desire for more skilled support personnel. Some Snyk customers found the solution's support to be dependable. Others say Snyk should overhaul how it categorizes and prioritizes support requests. Both products offer sufficient support, but Qualys VMDR appears to leave a more positive impression in terms of customer service.
Ease of Deployment: Qualys VMDR is considered uncomplicated and efficient, requiring only a short amount of time. A few users encountered challenges with integration and ensuring data privacy. Snyk users were somewhat divided about the product's setup difficulty. Some found it to be straightforward and fast, while others needed additional guidance. The time needed to implement Snyk could range from several days up to a couple of weeks.
Pricing: The cost of Qualys VMDR varies depending on the organization's business requirements. Some find it affordable, but others consider it costly compared to alternatives. Snyk's pricing is on the higher end of the spectrum, but it is regarded as reasonably priced for the features it offers.
ROI: Qualys VMDR is highly efficient in identifying vulnerabilities and reducing risks. Snyk offers a cost-effective solution for addressing bugs sooner in the development process, offsetting the high annual subscription fees.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer Qualys VMDR over Snyk for its robust features, such as continuous monitoring and a customizable dashboard. Users appreciate the great technical support and find the solution stable and reliable. Snyk needs improvement in terms of reporting and customer support. Also, Qualys VMDR's pricing is competitive, while Snyk's license is relatively expensive.
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run different capabilities with the same agent. With only one agent, we can have EDR, vulnerability management, compliance and some basic SaaS security capabilities."
"Intuitive and easy to use."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"I like that we have many scanners and channels that don't overload. It helps us scan and track easily. Also, the tagging system is good for tagging. We can still use QualysAgent task ID tools even if tags aren't made."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"It has a nice dashboard where I can see all the vulnerabilities and risks that they provided. I can also see the category of any risk, such as medium, high, and low. They provide the input priority-wise. The team can target the highest one first, and then they can go to medium and low ones."
"We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub."
"Provides clear information and is easy to follow with good feedback regarding code practices."
"The most valuable features include enriched information around the vulnerabilities for better triaging, in terms of the vulnerability layer origin and vulnerability tree."
"The product's most valuable features are an open-source platform, remote functionality, and good pricing."
"The solution has great features and is quite stable."
"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."
"I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy to detect security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to what they're currently using."
"There seems to be a lack of easy onboarding into Qualys."
"The disadvantage of working with Qualys is that the graphical interface is quite outdated."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"The IoT scan is not great."
"It's not very user-friendly at times and requires in-depth understanding. So, a layman or someone new to Qualys won't be able to easily understand it. You need education to use the solution."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
"They need to improve the Snyk plugins and make it easier to make your optimizations based on your own needs or features."
"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."
"It would be great if they can include dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning features. Checkmarx and Veracode provide dynamic, interactive, and run-time scanning, but Snyk doesn't do that. That's the reason there is more inclination towards Veracode, Checkmarx, or AppScan. These are a few tools available in the market that do all four types of scanning: static, dynamic, interactive, and run-time."
"Because Snyk has so many integrations and so many things it can do, it's hard to really understand all of them and to get that information to each team that needs it... If there were more self-service, perhaps tutorials or overviews for new teams or developers, so that they could click through and see things themselves, that would help."
"DAST has shortcomings, and Snyk needs to improve and overcome such shortcomings."
"The reporting mechanism of Snyk could improve. The reporting mechanism is available only on the higher level of license. Adjusting the policy of the current setup of recording this report is something that can improve. For instance, if you have a certain license, you receive a rating, and the rating of this license remains the same for any use case. No matter if you are using it internally or using it externally, you cannot make the adjustment to your use case. It will always alert as a risky license. The areas of licenses in the reporting and adjustments can be improve"
"There are some new features that we would like to see added, e.g., more visibility into library usage for the code. Something along the lines where it's doing the identification of where vulnerabilities are used, etc. This would cause them to stand out in the market as a much different platform."
"The feature for automatic fixing of security breaches could be improved."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Snyk is ranked 5th in Container Security with 41 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Snyk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snyk writes "Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Snyk is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, Fortify Static Code Analyzer, Veracode and GitHub Advanced Security. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Snyk report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
