We performed a comparison between Quest InTrust and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"It helps streamline troubleshooting and log analysis."
"It is quite extensible. It is a platform that we can build our use instead of each case instead of each case being limited or restricted to each capability. This is probably the best feature."
"It provides a risk score for each object, device, or user. We can then take action if they are at a higher risk."
"Splunk has significantly helped with aggregation and correlation of critical logs. Not having to grep on each individual server has made everyone more efficient."
"Splunk can extract all kinds of data. There's no limitation on what kind of structured and unstructured data one needs to extract — it can access any kind of data, including machine-generated data."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"It helped us consolidate all our solutions into an easy tool to use for various employees."
"Deployment server for deploying changes in one go."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"We are waiting for Dashboard Studio to mature a little bit more. There are some things that we are using with Classic Dashboards which have not yet made it to Dashboard Studio. We are waiting for that."
"I feel as though a major focus of upcoming releases should be set on Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, and I would enjoy to see more security focused add-ons and apps developed by the vendor."
"The initial setup is complex, but this is necessary. We needed to take into consideration how to direct log files from thousands of machines to Splunk, and how to ingest those files."
"When we do a rollout from the server or host or anything, we'd like to see more automation. It would save us time."
"This is a costly solution."
"I find the graphical options really limited and you don't have enough control over how to display the data that you want to see."
"Writing queries is a bit complicated sometimes."
"Splunk Enterprise Security has not helped reduce our alert volume."
Earn 20 points
Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 228 reviews. Quest InTrust is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
