RADARK vs ThreatQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
KELA Group Logo
156 views|61 comparisons
ThreatQuotient Logo
843 views|610 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RADARK and ThreatQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Integrating the solution with our existing security tools and workflows was easy.
Top Answer:The tool is not user-friendly. It is not beginner-friendly. It would be very difficult for a beginner to learn the tool. It will take at least two months to get familiar with it. Building the playbook… more »
Top Answer:We used the solution for threat mapping and managing IoCs.
Ranking
Views
156
Comparisons
61
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
843
Comparisons
610
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
KELA RADARK
Learn More
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

KELA provides intelligence by using an automated technology, which monitors a curated set of Darknet sources, providing fully targeted, actionable intelligence. All threats are analyzed and qualified by KELA's analysts, ensuring all intelligence is 100% actionable.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Sample Customers
Canadian Bank, US Corporate, Japanese Automobile Company
Radar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company14%
Government9%
Educational Organization9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RADARK is ranked 36th in Threat Intelligence Platforms while ThreatQ is ranked 16th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. RADARK is rated 0.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Improves the threat intelligence gathering process, but it is not user-friendly". RADARK is most compared with , whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and CrowdStrike Falcon.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.