We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RedSeal Logo
2,055 views|1,414 comparisons
Tufin Logo
Read 14 Tufin reviews.
19,331 views|11,578 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly, Ekahau, RedSeal and others in Network Modeling. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration.""RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out.""This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

More RedSeal Pros »

"There are a lot of benefits to using the reporting. It gives us duplicate objects, duplicate services, shadow firewall rules, and the firewall rules not needed for a given number of days or months.""The solution is quite scalable.""It is an important application for controlling and monitoring firewall rules. It is useful for making and monitoring the changes.""It allows administrators to visualize the traffic flow, and troubleshoot when necessary.""You can easily scale the solution if you need to.""It's user-friendly. It's easy to understand menus on the web GUI. That's a good feature for us. I can say that it's doing what it's supposed to do. It also integrates well with other products like Check Point.""All the basic functions work well.""It provides very good reports. It can easily integrate with multiple firewalls, such as Cisco, Juniper, Palo Alto, and Checkpoint. We can push a policy from Tufin to a firewall, which is a very good feature. We can monitor all access rules and the operating system of a firewall."

More Tufin Pros »

Cons
"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency.""Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus.""The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

More RedSeal Cons »

"I would like to see visibility into the FW features like IPS/Content Filter policies, the same way it does for FW rules/policies.""There are pros and cons to the workflow. You cannot customize it fully and there are some limitations. You cannot create a pure object, a firewall, IP, or service (single layer) object. You can only create a firewall object group. That is one of the challenges.""The pricing could be a bit more competitive.""Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin.""I would like to see AI elements included with this solution.""Lacks ability to create a Terraform that would enable deployment without manual steps.""They are a little bit behind on some of their support for the Palo Alto firewall platform. I'd like to see that catch up, specifically around importing certain objects.""The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."

More Tufin Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

More RedSeal Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is reasonable.""Price could always be better, but there are always consequences.""It's quite an expensive solution.""The price is on the cheaper side.""I believe our cost is more than $100,000 per year.""Because we're quite a large company, the price wasn't too much of a factor for us.""Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years."

More Tufin Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the… more »
Top Answer: Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to… more »
Top Answer: We had a distributing environment, and we used RedSeal to look into the gaps in existing network connectivities. We looked into if any of the forbidden accesses are open. We also looked at the points… more »
Top Answer: All the basic functions work well.
Top Answer: As an architect, the pricing seems expensive to me. For what it does, I would say it's expensive.
Top Answer: Our compliance goes through SecureChange and they give us the rule set and then the recommendation. Ideally we'd like to press a button and create a Terraform to put into the build and deploy. We… more »
Ranking
3rd
out of 6 in Network Modeling
Views
2,055
Comparisons
1,414
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
984
Rating
8.0
Views
19,331
Comparisons
11,578
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
493
Rating
8.4
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

RedSeal’s network modeling and risk scoring platform builds an accurate, up-to-date model of an organization’s entire, as-built network to visualize access paths, prioritize what to fix, so you can target existing cybersecurity resources to protect your most valuable assets. With RedSeal’s Digital Resilience Score, decision makers can see the security status and benchmark progress toward digital resilience.

Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

Offer
Learn more about RedSeal
Learn more about Tufin
Sample Customers
United States Postal Service, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Interval International
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government15%
Financial Services Firm9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider9%
Healthcare Company8%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise75%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise82%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about NetAlly, Ekahau, RedSeal and others in Network Modeling. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RedSeal is ranked 3rd in Network Modeling with 3 reviews while Tufin is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 14 reviews. RedSeal is rated 8.0, while Tufin is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of RedSeal writes "Improves visibility, helps determine risk and compliance, and reliably enhances security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin writes "Provides great visibility, allows us to automate the entire change process, and saves A LOT of time". RedSeal is most compared with AlgoSec, Skybox Security Suite, FireMon, Darktrace and Riverbed Modeler, whereas Tufin is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco Defense Orchestrator.

We monitor all Network Modeling reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.