Sangfor SSL VPN vs Systancia Gate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Netgate Logo
63 views|25 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Sangfor Logo
244 views|151 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Systancia Logo
64 views|48 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sangfor SSL VPN and Systancia Gate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN.
To learn more, read our detailed SSL VPN Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is not a license required for this solution but the price should be less expensive."
  • More Netgate TNSR Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is good and the standard license allows for 30 users."
  • "The product is inexpensive."
  • "My company has a three-year license for Sangfor SSL VPN."
  • "The first 30 licenses are free, and you have to purchase the rest if required."
  • More Sangfor SSL VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled.
    Top Answer:The product is very cost-effective and has no requirement for additional licenses. The setup is not easy. Users need… more »
    Top Answer:THe solution is used as a primary gateway with two lease lines of 450 Mbps total. Around 200 users are under it. There… more »
    Top Answer:The platform is expensive in our region compared to products like Fortinet and Cisco.
    Top Answer:There is an area of improvement related to the configuration of specific numbers required for compatibility with banks… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    TNSR
    Systancia IPdiva Secure
    Learn More
    Overview

    TNSR is an advanced open source-based secure networking software platform with highly-scalable packet processing, manageability, and service expansion capabilities. This video provides a high-level introduction. that address a number of commonly asked new product questions - in just a couple of minutes.

    Sangfor SSL VPN provides support for remote user to access the enterprise network from anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) enabled by a SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications (e.g.: Easy Connect) using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support.

    Sangfor SSL VPN provides SSL VPN remote-access connectivity from almost any Internet-enabled location using a web browser or a APP that natively support SSL encryption. This feature allows your Company to extend access to its secure enterprise network to any authorized user by providing remote-access connectivity to corporate resources.

    Systancia Gate, formerly IPdiva Secure, is a cybersecurity solution which provides ultra-secured access to corporate resources and applications for any type of remote user (roaming users, teleworkers, third party service providers, etc.). It is the only solution in the market awarded at the so-called “Elementary-Qualification” level by the ANSSI (French National Cybersecurity Agency) in the identification, authentication and access control segment. With a unique access architecture not needing an open port to the IT system, Systancia Gate is mostly used by enterprises and service providers for a secure extranet access to corporate managed applications.

    Sample Customers
    UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
    Investcorp, Central Bancorp, Griffiths & Armour
    Beaumanoir Group, Gelmalto, Wurth or University Hospital in Bordeaux, Botanic, Cassidian Cyber Security, CAT Group, University Hospital in Nantes, Grosfillex, Labeyrie, L’occitane, Gagneraud Construction, University Hospital in Caen, Picoty...
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    SSL VPN
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews while Systancia Gate is ranked 12th in SSL VPN. Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4, while Systancia Gate is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". On the other hand, Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server, AWS Direct Connect and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Systancia Gate is most compared with .

    See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

    We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.