• Home
  • SAS rPath [EOL] vs. XRebel

SAS rPath [EOL] vs XRebel comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAS Logo

SAS rPath [EOL]

Read 1 SAS rPath [EOL] review
views| comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Perforce Logo

XRebel

41 views|27 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS rPath [EOL] and XRebel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.
I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment
Use XRebel?
Ranking
Unranked
In Release Automation
26th
out of 29 in Performance Testing Tools
Views
41
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
rPath
Learn More
SAS
Perforce
Overview
rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.

XRebel was designed to be a lightweight performance tool that would run all the time on the developer machine, issuing an alert when an issue is found and providing real time data to pinpoint the root cause. This creates an opportunity to proactively manage the most common performance issues at a tiny fraction of the cost of performance testing.

XRebel is great at preventing the most common issues, which is latency causing poor end-user experience probably caused by a bug in the database access layer or application logic. Theseaccount for the absolute majority of performance issues, but don’t require sophistication to fix. XRebel focuses on making those painfully obvious to the developer.

Sample Customers
Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
ICON Health & Fitness, Antea, JOYTECH GmbH
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation while XRebel is ranked 26th in Performance Testing Tools. SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0, while XRebel is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". On the other hand, SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with , whereas XRebel is most compared with .

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.