Compare SEEBURGER BIS vs. SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing, compared to the tool that we had earlier, is cheaper.""The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially.""The pricing is cheap. In fact, when I saw the pricing, I thought, "Really? What's the catch?" But the functionality that we get out of it, for the price we pay, is great value.""I find the pricing expensive. But I know that when we evaluated another company, it was about the same. That just seems to be the market. It's probably not expensive overall.""Pricing has always seemed fair.""All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want...""Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run.""Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen,"… more »
Top Answer: The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if… more »
Top Answer: For the area that we've used them for so far, I don't really see any way that they can make it easier. I can't say enough about how they have delivered exactly what they said that they would, and for… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
Views
6,801
Comparisons
2,062
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
1,725
Avg. Rating
8.4
38th
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration SuiteServ-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
Learn
Seeburger
SolarWinds
Overview

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

Offer
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer23%
Transportation Company19%
Manufacturing Company15%
Pharma/Biotech Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider10%
Non Profit6%
Retailer6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise81%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Managed File Transfer with 15 reviews while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is ranked 38th in Managed File Transfer. SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.4, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". On the other hand, SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.