Compare SEEBURGER BIS vs. WS_FTP Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SEEBURGER BIS Logo
6,252 views|1,956 comparisons
WS_FTP Server Logo
184 views|135 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use WS_FTP Server? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, IBM, NetCart AB and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business.On an annual basis, our support costs, which are based on the licensing, are about £120,000.We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box.There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour.We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them.The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license...Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle.We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable.

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
6,252
Comparisons
1,956
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
1,641
Avg. Rating
8.3
22nd
Views
184
Comparisons
135
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 68% of the time.
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
Seeburger
Progress Software
Overview

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

Offer
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about WS_FTP Server
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, CofrescoBraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company25%
Retailer20%
Pharma/Biotech Company15%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Non Profit7%
Retailer7%
Comms Service Provider6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, IBM, NetCart AB and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Managed File Transfer with 20 reviews while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer. SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.4, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". On the other hand, SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit and Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.