We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and UBIK Load Pack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools.Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while UBIK Load Pack is ranked 22nd in Load Testing Tools. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while UBIK Load Pack is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas UBIK Load Pack is most compared with .
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.