OpenText Silk Performer vs UBIK Load Pack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
861 views|511 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
UBIK Ingénierie Logo
118 views|79 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and UBIK Load Pack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure.
Top Answer:I think the cost is on the higher side when compared to some of the newer tools. You can't really compare this with other tools because some of the newer ones are not as feature-rich and as easy to… more »
Top Answer:In terms of areas of improvement, I would say the Silk Performance Explorer tool, which is used for monitoring and analysis, can be improved because that's where we spend most of our time when we're… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
10th
out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
Views
861
Comparisons
511
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
621
Rating
8.0
22nd
out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
Views
118
Comparisons
79
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Silk Performer, Silk Performer
Learn More
Overview

Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

Cloud in
Integrated scalability from the Cloud
Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

Retina scan
Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

Monitor
A leading web support for load and stress testing
Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

Comprehensive mobile performance testing
Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

Enterprise Grade load testing plugins for Apache JMeter. 

Realistic & Scalable Load Testing of Video Streaming servers delivering Live and VOD Streams with support for MPEG Dash, HLS, MS Smooth & Adobe HDS. 

Auto-Correlation for fast & Easy Load Testing of Enterprise Applications (Vaadin, Oracle JD Edwards, Hyperion Financial Management, Siebel, PeopleSoft...). 

Realistic load testing of Rich Clients (GWT, FLEX/AIR Plugin) and Java Serialization based applications. 

Monitoring Plugin for popular APMs: Dynatrace OneAgent, Dynatrace AppMon, AppDynamics, NudgeAPM

Sample Customers
University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
SKY, CISCO, NOKIA, PANASONIC, ERICSSON GROUP, ADEO, VEVO, GEFCO, AGFA HealthCare, STIBO SYSTEMS
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm25%
Computer Software Company18%
Government9%
Insurance Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Load Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while UBIK Load Pack is ranked 22nd in Load Testing Tools. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while UBIK Load Pack is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas UBIK Load Pack is most compared with .

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.