Compare STG Active Risk Manager vs. ZenGRC

STG Active Risk Manager is ranked 34th in GRC while ZenGRC is ranked 15th in GRC. STG Active Risk Manager is rated 0, while ZenGRC is rated 0. On the other hand, STG Active Risk Manager is most compared with , whereas ZenGRC is most compared with RSA Archer, MetricStream and LogicManager.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
STG Active Risk Manager Logo
74 views|43 comparisons
ZenGRC Logo
542 views|419 comparisons
Ranking
34th
out of 52 in GRC
Views
74
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
15th
out of 52 in GRC
Views
542
Comparisons
419
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 70% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Strategic Thought
Learn
Active Risk
Reciprocity
Video Not Available
Overview

Active Risk Manager (ARM) solution can collect all risk data from anywhere in an organization, compiling it into one centralized system. ARM is the system of record for all risk-related information within an organization, putting high quality, real-time governance and compliance data at the fingertips of executives and risk managers - without reliance on a patchwork of systems or spreadsheets. If a risk is identified, response plans and fallbacks can be instantly accessible to all through ARM, the enterprise-wide, web-based system.

ZenGRC is designed to help you manage your governance, risk, and compliance programs. It was also designed with the end user in mind. The result? The industry's easiest to use, most intuitive product.

Offer
Learn more about STG Active Risk Manager
Learn more about ZenGRC
Sample Customers
EADS, Eurocopter, Lockheed Martin, RaytheonWalmart, Airbnb, Peak 10, State of Colorado, salesforce.com, GitHub, Alaska Airlines, Montgomery College
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.